Private Blind Model Averaging - Distributed, Non-interactive, and Convergent
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Distributed differentially private learning techniques enable a large number of users to jointly learn a model without having to first centrally collect the training data. At the same time, neither the communication between the users nor the resulting model shall leak information about the training data. This kind of learning technique can be deployed to edge devices if it can be scaled up to a large number of users, particularly if the communication is reduced to a minimum: no interaction, i.e., each party only sends a single message. The best previously known methods are based on gradient averaging, which inherently requires many synchronization rounds. A promising non-interactive alternative to gradient averaging relies on so-called output perturbation: each user first locally finishes training and then submits its model for secure averaging without further synchronization. We analyze this paradigm, which we coin blind model averaging (BlindAvg), in the setting of convex and smooth empirical risk minimization (ERM) like a support vector machine (SVM). While the required noise scale is asymptotically the same as in the centralized setting, it is not well understood how close BlindAvg comes to centralized learning, i.e., its utility cost. We characterize and boost the privacy-utility tradeoff of BlindAvg with two contributions: First, we prove that BlindAvg converges towards the centralized setting for a sufficiently strong L2-regularization for a non-smooth SVM learner. Second, we introduce the novel differentially private convex and smooth ERM learner SoftmaxReg that has a better privacy-utility tradeoff than an SVM in a multi-class setting. We evaluate our findings on three datasets (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Federated EMNIST) and provide an ablation in an artificially extreme non-IID scenario.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2022.
Builds on
26 of 59 references.
References · 26
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,380
- 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 792
- 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 552
- 2019Selective Kernel Networkscited by 403
- 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 383
- 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 297
- 2020Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)cited by 235
- 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 224
14 more
- 2018A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 210
- 2019Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Optimal Ratescited by 186
- 2018cpSGD: Communication-efficient and differentially-private distributed SGDcited by 158
- 2020Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in Linear Timecited by 153
- 2018Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization Revisited: Faster and More Generalcited by 128
- 2021The Distributed Discrete Gaussian Mechanism for Federated Learning with Secure Aggregationcited by 128
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Iterationcited by 100
- 2018On the Fenchel Duality between Strong Convexity and Lipschitz Continuous Gradientcited by 43
- 2020Privacy Amplification via Random Check-Inscited by 39
- 2022The Fundamental Price of Secure Aggregation in Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 39
- 2020Dual Policy Distillationcited by 25
- 2022Beyond Uniform Lipschitz Condition in Differentially Private Optimizationcited by 19
- 2019Interaction is necessary for distributed learning with privacy or communication constraintscited by 8
- 2018Locally Private Learning without Interaction Requires Separationcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.