mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Manipulation of individual judgments in the quantitative pairwise comparisons method

arXiv 2211.01809 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2022cs.AI cs.DMcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Decision-making methods very often use the technique of comparing alternatives in pairs. In this approach, experts are asked to compare different options, and then a quantitative ranking is created from the results obtained. It is commonly believed that experts (decision-makers) are honest in their judgments. In our work, we consider a scenario in which experts are vulnerable to bribery. For this purpose, we define a framework that allows us to determine the intended manipulation and present three algorithms for achieving the intended goal. Analyzing these algorithms may provide clues to help defend against such attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2022.

Builds on

6 of 87 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019On the monotonicity of the eigenvector methodcited by 7
  2. 2013On Axiomatization of Inconsistency Indicators for Pairwise Comparisonscited by 5
  3. 2014On the Properties of the Priority Deriving Procedure in the Pairwise Comparisons Methodcited by 4
  4. 2015Studying a set of properties of inconsistency indices for pairwise comparisonscited by 3
  5. 2021Gerrymandering on graphs: Computational complexity and parameterized algorithmscited by 2
  6. 2021Obvious Manipulability of Voting Rulescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.