Gerrymandering on graphs: Computational complexity and parameterized algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Partitioning a region into districts to favor a particular candidate or a party is commonly known as gerrymandering. In this paper, we investigate the gerrymandering problem in graph theoretic setting as proposed by Cohen-Zemach et al. [AAMAS 2018]. Our contributions in this article are two-fold, conceptual and computational. We first resolve the open question posed by Ito et al. [AAMAS 2019] about the computational complexity of the problem when the input graph is a path. Next, we propose a generalization of their model, where the input consists of a graph on n vertices representing the set of voters, a set of m candidates C, a weight function wv: Crightarrow mathbb Z^+ for each voter v∈ V(G) representing the preference of the voter over the candidates, a distinguished candidate p∈ C, and a positive integer k. The objective is to decide if one can partition the vertex set into k pairwise disjoint connected sets (districts) s.t p wins more districts than any other candidate. The problem is known to be NPC even if k=2, m=2, and G is either a complete bipartite graph (in fact K2,n) or a complete graph. This means that in search for FPT algorithms we need to either focus on the parameter n, or subclasses of forest. Circumventing these intractable results, we give a deterministic and a randomized algorithms for the problem on paths running in times 2.619k(n+m)O(1) and 2k(n+m)O(1), respectively. Additionally, we prove that the problem on general graphs is solvable in time 2n (n+m)O(1). Our algorithmic results use sophisticated technical tools such as representative set family and Fast Fourier transform based polynomial multiplication, and their (possibly first) application to problems arising in social choice theory and/or game theory may be of independent interest to the community.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
2 papers.
- 2022Manipulation of individual judgments in the quantitative pairwise comparisons methodcited by 1
- 2023Gerrymandering Planar Graphscited by 0
- 2023Gerrymandering Planar Graphs22 Dec 2023
- 2022Manipulation of individual judgments in the quantitative pairwise comparisons method1 Nov 2022