Cross-stitching Text and Knowledge Graph Encoders for Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bi-encoder architectures for distantly-supervised relation extraction are designed to make use of the complementary information found in text and knowledge graphs (KG). However, current architectures suffer from two drawbacks. They either do not allow any sharing between the text encoder and the KG encoder at all, or, in case of models with KG-to-text attention, only share information in one direction. Here, we introduce cross-stitch bi-encoders, which allow full interaction between the text encoder and the KG encoder via a cross-stitch mechanism. The cross-stitch mechanism allows sharing and updating representations between the two encoders at any layer, with the amount of sharing being dynamically controlled via cross-attention-based gates. Experimental results on two relation extraction benchmarks from two different domains show that enabling full interaction between the two encoders yields strong improvements.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2022.
Builds on
21 of 39 references.
References · 21
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,935
- 2016Cross-stitch Networks for Multi-task Learningcited by 466
- 2019ScispaCy: Fast and Robust Models for Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 244
- 2020Learning from Context or Names? An Empirical Study on Neural Relation Extractioncited by 75
- 2019OpenNRE: An Open and Extensible Toolkit for Neural Relation Extractioncited by 62
- 2019Long-tail Relation Extraction via Knowledge Graph Embeddings and Graph Convolution Networkscited by 61
- 2018RESIDE: Improving Distantly-Supervised Neural Relation Extraction using Side Informationcited by 47
- 2019Fine-tuning Pre-Trained Transformer Language Models to Distantly Supervised Relation Extractioncited by 36
- 2018Improving Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction using Word and Entity Based Attentioncited by 35
9 more
- 2019Distant Supervision Relation Extraction with Intra-Bag and Inter-Bag Attentionscited by 27
- 2013Connecting Language and Knowledge Bases with Embedding Models for Relation Extractioncited by 21
- 2019Self-Attention Enhanced Selective Gate with Entity-Aware Embedding for Distantly Supervised Relation Extractioncited by 18
- 2021Manual Evaluation Matters: Reviewing Test Protocols of Distantly Supervised Relation Extractioncited by 12
- 2016Incorporating Relation Paths in Neural Relation Extractioncited by 9
- 2018Multi-Level Structured Self-Attentions for Distantly Supervised Relation Extractioncited by 8
- 2021How Knowledge Graph and Attention Help? A Quantitative Analysis into Bag-level Relation Extractioncited by 8
- 2019Leveraging 2-hop Distant Supervision from Table Entity Pairs for Relation Extractioncited by 3
- 2021Two Training Strategies for Improving Relation Extraction over Universal Graphcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.