Fair Visual Recognition via Intervention with Proxy Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning models often learn to make predictions that rely on sensitive social attributes like gender and race, which poses significant fairness risks, especially in societal applications, e.g., hiring, banking, and criminal justice. Existing work tackles this issue by minimizing information about social attributes in models for debiasing. However, the high correlation between target task and social attributes makes bias mitigation incompatible with target task accuracy. Recalling that model bias arises because the learning of features in regard to bias attributes (i.e., bias features) helps target task optimization, we explore the following research question: Can we leverage proxy features to replace the role of bias feature in target task optimization for debiasing? To this end, we propose Proxy Debiasing, to first transfer the target task's learning of bias information from bias features to artificial proxy features, and then employ causal intervention to eliminate proxy features in inference. The key idea of Proxy Debiasing is to design controllable proxy features to on one hand replace bias features in contributing to target task during the training stage, and on the other hand easily to be removed by intervention during the inference stage. This guarantees the elimination of bias features without affecting the target information, thus addressing the fairness-accuracy paradox in previous debiasing solutions. We apply Proxy Debiasing to several benchmark datasets, and achieve significant improvements over the state-of-the-art debiasing methods in both of accuracy and fairness.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2022.
Builds on
26 of 36 references.
References · 26
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,421
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 426
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
- 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
14 more
- 2020Causal Intervention for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 229
- 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
- 2019Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglementcited by 196
- 2019Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learningcited by 146
- 2019On the Fairness of Disentangled Representationscited by 144
- 2021Explaining in Style: Training a GAN to explain a classifier in StyleSpacecited by 122
- 2020Interventional Few-Shot Learningcited by 112
- 2020Visual Commonsense R-CNNcited by 106
- 2021EnD: Entangling and Disentangling deep representations for bias correctioncited by 105
- 2021Fairness via Representation Neutralizationcited by 63
- 2021Fair Feature Distillation for Visual Recognitioncited by 59
- 2019Conscientious Classification: A Data Scientist's Guide to Discrimination-Aware Classificationcited by 55
- 2022Counterfactually Measuring and Eliminating Social Bias in Vision-Language Pre-training Modelscited by 28
- 2018Gradient Reversal Against Discriminationcited by 20
Built on by
Not cited yet.