mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SoK: Modeling Explainability in Security Analytics for Interpretability, Trustworthiness, and Usability

arXiv 2210.17376 ↗First posted 31 Oct 2022cs.CR cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Interpretability, trustworthiness, and usability are key considerations in high-stake security applications, especially when utilizing deep learning models. While these models are known for their high accuracy, they behave as black boxes in which identifying important features and factors that led to a classification or a prediction is difficult. This can lead to uncertainty and distrust, especially when an incorrect prediction results in severe consequences. Thus, explanation methods aim to provide insights into the inner working of deep learning models. However, most explanation methods provide inconsistent explanations, have low fidelity, and are susceptible to adversarial manipulation, which can reduce model trustworthiness. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of explainable methods and demonstrates their efficacy in three distinct security applications: anomaly detection using system logs, malware prediction, and detection of adversarial images. Our quantitative and qualitative analysis reveals serious limitations and concerns in state-of-the-art explanation methods in all three applications. We show that explanation methods for security applications necessitate distinct characteristics, such as stability, fidelity, robustness, and usability, among others, which we outline as the prerequisites for trustworthy explanation methods.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 61 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2022.

Builds on

61 of 105 references.

References · 61

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  6. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  7. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  8. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  9. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  10. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  11. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  12. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
38 more
  1. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  2. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  3. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  4. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  5. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  6. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  7. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  8. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  9. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  10. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
  11. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  12. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
  13. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 440
  14. 2021Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challengescited by 364
  15. 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 310
  16. 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 303
  17. 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 295
  18. 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 280
  19. 2017Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifactscited by 244
  20. 2019On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural Networkscited by 239
  21. 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 215
  22. 2020Evaluating and Aggregating Feature-based Model Explanationscited by 185
  23. 2022Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyondcited by 171
  24. 2019One Explanation Does Not Fit All: A Toolkit and Taxonomy of AI Explainability Techniquescited by 164
  25. 2021Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Modelscited by 136
  26. 2016Technical Report on the CleverHans v2.1.0 Adversarial Examples Librarycited by 123
  27. 2019Fooling Neural Network Interpretations via Adversarial Model Manipulationcited by 112
  28. 2019Explainability Fact Sheets: A Framework for Systematic Assessment of Explainable Approachescited by 101
  29. 2020Human-centered Explainable AI: Towards a Reflective Sociotechnical Approachcited by 90
  30. 2017Learning how to explain neural networks: PatternNet and PatternAttributioncited by 84
  31. 2017Explainable AI: Beware of Inmates Running the Asylum Or: How I Learnt to Stop Worrying and Love the Social and Behavioural Sciencescited by 84
  32. 2018Model Reconstruction from Model Explanationscited by 84
  33. 2019On the Connection Between Adversarial Robustness and Saliency Map Interpretabilitycited by 80
  34. 2018Interpretable Deep Learning under Firecited by 74
  35. 2022Rethinking Stability for Attribution-based Explanationscited by 52
  36. 2018Privacy-preserving Predictioncited by 48
  37. 2019ML-LOO: Detecting Adversarial Examples with Feature Attributioncited by 48
  38. 2021Robust Explainability: A Tutorial on Gradient-Based Attribution Methods for Deep Neural Networkscited by 48

50 most cited of 61 All 61 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

7 papers.