mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Probability-Dependent Gradient Decay in Large Margin Softmax

arXiv 2210.17145 ↗First posted 31 Oct 2022stat.ML cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the past few years, Softmax has become a common component in neural network frameworks. In this paper, a gradient decay hyperparameter is introduced in Softmax to control the probability-dependent gradient decay rate during training. By following the theoretical analysis and empirical results of a variety of model architectures trained on MNIST, CIFAR-10/100 and SVHN, we find that the generalization performance depends significantly on the gradient decay rate as the confidence probability rises, i.e., the gradient decreases convexly or concavely as the sample probability increases. Moreover, optimization with the small gradient decay shows a similar curriculum learning sequence where hard samples are in the spotlight only after easy samples are convinced sufficiently, and well-separated samples gain a higher gradient to reduce intra-class distance. Based on the analysis results, we can provide evidence that the large margin Softmax will affect the local Lipschitz constraint of the loss function by regulating the probability-dependent gradient decay rate. This paper provides a new perspective and understanding of the relationship among concepts of large margin Softmax, local Lipschitz constraint and curriculum learning by analyzing the gradient decay rate. Besides, we propose a warm-up strategy to dynamically adjust Softmax loss in training, where the gradient decay rate increases from over-small to speed up the convergence rate.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2022.

Builds on

23 of 34 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  5. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,845
  6. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
  7. 2017Focal Loss for Dense Object Detectioncited by 752
  8. 2017SphereFace: Deep Hypersphere Embedding for Face Recognitioncited by 737
  9. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 655
  10. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  11. 2016Training Region-based Object Detectors with Online Hard Example Miningcited by 579
  12. 2020Understanding the Behaviour of Contrastive Losscited by 398
11 more
  1. 2019Why gradient clipping accelerates training: A theoretical justification for adaptivitycited by 341
  2. 2020CurricularFace: Adaptive Curriculum Learning Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 321
  3. 2016Large-Margin Softmax Loss for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 296
  4. 2018Additive Margin Softmax for Face Verificationcited by 278
  5. 2018Large Margin Deep Networks for Classificationcited by 112
  6. 2017L2-constrained Softmax Loss for Discriminative Face Verificationcited by 96
  7. 2019Mis-classified Vector Guided Softmax Loss for Face Recognitioncited by 60
  8. 2019Hardness-Aware Deep Metric Learningcited by 55
  9. 2020Temperature check: theory and practice for training models with softmax-cross-entropy lossescited by 31
  10. 2021Towards Understanding Learning in Neural Networks with Linear Teacherscited by 19
  11. 2018Heated-Up Softmax Embeddingcited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.