Security-Preserving Federated Learning via Byzantine-Sensitive Triplet Distance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While being an effective framework of learning a shared model across multiple edge devices, federated learning (FL) is generally vulnerable to Byzantine attacks from adversarial edge devices. While existing works on FL mitigate such compromised devices by only aggregating a subset of the local models at the server side, they still cannot successfully ignore the outliers due to imprecise scoring rule. In this paper, we propose an effective Byzantine-robust FL framework, namely dummy contrastive aggregation, by defining a novel scoring function that sensitively discriminates whether the model has been poisoned or not. Key idea is to extract essential information from every local models along with the previous global model to define a distance measure in a manner similar to triplet loss. Numerical results validate the advantage of the proposed approach by showing improved performance as compared to the state-of-the-art Byzantine-resilient aggregation methods, e.g., Krum, Trimmed-mean, and Fang.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2022.
Builds on
17 of 25 references.
References · 17
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
- 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,375
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
- 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 762
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
- 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental Studycited by 566
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
- 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 346
5 more
- 2020Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systemscited by 266
- 2022MPAF: Model Poisoning Attacks to Federated Learning based on Fake Clientscited by 65
- 2019Learning to Demodulate from Few Pilots via Offline and Online Meta-Learningcited by 21
- 2017A Brief Introduction to Machine Learning for Engineerscited by 20
- 2019Meta-Learning to Communicate: Fast End-to-End Training for Fading Channelscited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2.
5 papers.
- 2024Tackling Noisy Clients in Federated Learning with End-to-end Label Correctioncited by 11
- 2025FNBench: Benchmarking Robust Federated Learning against Noisy Labelscited by 6
- 2025A Unified Benchmark of Federated Learning with Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks for Medical Imagingcited by 3
- 2024Generative AI-Powered Plugin for Robust Federated Learning in Heterogeneous IoT Networkscited by 0
- 2024Embedding Byzantine Fault Tolerance into Federated Learning via Consistency Scoringcited by 0
- 2025FNBench: Benchmarking Robust Federated Learning against Noisy Labels10 May 2025
- 2025A Unified Benchmark of Federated Learning with Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks for Medical Imaging28 Apr 2025
- 2024Embedding Byzantine Fault Tolerance into Federated Learning via Consistency Scoring15 Nov 2024
- 2024Generative AI-Powered Plugin for Robust Federated Learning in Heterogeneous IoT Networks31 Oct 2024
- 2024Tackling Noisy Clients in Federated Learning with End-to-end Label Correction8 Aug 2024