Modeling structure-building in the brain with CCG parsing and large language models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To model behavioral and neural correlates of language comprehension in naturalistic environments researchers have turned to broad-coverage tools from natural-language processing and machine learning. Where syntactic structure is explicitly modeled, prior work has relied predominantly on context-free grammars (CFG), yet such formalisms are not sufficiently expressive for human languages. Combinatory Categorial Grammars (CCGs) are sufficiently expressive directly compositional models of grammar with flexible constituency that affords incremental interpretation. In this work we evaluate whether a more expressive CCG provides a better model than a CFG for human neural signals collected with fMRI while participants listen to an audiobook story. We further test between variants of CCG that differ in how they handle optional adjuncts. These evaluations are carried out against a baseline that includes estimates of next-word predictability from a Transformer neural network language model. Such a comparison reveals unique contributions of CCG structure-building predominantly in the left posterior temporal lobe: CCG-derived measures offer a superior fit to neural signals compared to those derived from a CFG. These effects are spatially distinct from bilateral superior temporal effects that are unique to predictability. Neural effects for structure-building are thus separable from predictability during naturalistic listening, and those effects are best characterized by a grammar whose expressive power is motivated on independent linguistic grounds.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 114 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2022.
Builds on
17 of 114 references.
References · 17
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
- 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,973
- 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,199
- 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
- 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 317
- 2018Multilingual Constituency Parsing with Self-Attention and Pre-Trainingcited by 117
- 2015Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAICcited by 110
- 2016Recurrent Neural Network Grammarscited by 109
5 more
- 2020Syntactic Structure from Deep Learningcited by 99
- 2014Machine Learning for Neuroimaging with Scikit-Learncited by 70
- 2018Finding Syntax in Human Encephalography with Beam Searchcited by 41
- 2020Assessing Phrasal Representation and Composition in Transformerscited by 41
- 2016What Do Recurrent Neural Network Grammars Learn About Syntax?cited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 6; 2026: 4.
11 papers.
- 2025How Linguistics Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Language Modelscited by 50
- 2024Computational Models to Study Language Processing in the Human Brain: A Surveycited by 4
- 2025Modelling Child Learning and Parsing of Long-range Syntactic Dependenciescited by 0
- 2025Language models as tools for investigating the distinction between possible and impossible natural languagescited by 0
- 2025Large language models have learned to use languagecited by 0
- 2025Large language models are not about natural languagecited by 0
- 2025Linguists should learn to love speech-based deep learning modelscited by 0
- 2026Are Language Models Models?cited by 0
- 2026Across the Levels of Analysis: Explaining Predictive Processing in Humans Requires More Than Machine-Estimated Probabilitiescited by 0
- 2026You Can't Fight in Here! This is BBS!cited by 0
- 2026Not-So-Strange Love: Language Models and Generative Linguistic Theories are More Compatible than They Appearcited by 0
- 2026Not-So-Strange Love: Language Models and Generative Linguistic Theories are More Compatible than They Appear11 May 2026
- 2026You Can't Fight in Here! This is BBS!10 Apr 2026
- 2026Across the Levels of Analysis: Explaining Predictive Processing in Humans Requires More Than Machine-Estimated Probabilities10 Apr 2026
- 2026Are Language Models Models?15 Jan 2026
- 2025Linguists should learn to love speech-based deep learning models16 Dec 2025
- 2025Large language models are not about natural language15 Dec 2025
- 2025Large language models have learned to use language13 Dec 2025
- 2025Language models as tools for investigating the distinction between possible and impossible natural languages10 Dec 2025
- 2025Modelling Child Learning and Parsing of Long-range Syntactic Dependencies17 Mar 2025
- 2025How Linguistics Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Language Models28 Jan 2025
- 2024Computational Models to Study Language Processing in the Human Brain: A Survey20 Mar 2024