mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Analyzing Multi-Task Learning for Abstractive Text Summarization

arXiv 2210.14606 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2022cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the recent success of multi-task learning and pre-finetuning for natural language understanding, few works have studied the effects of task families on abstractive text summarization. Task families are a form of task grouping during the pre-finetuning stage to learn common skills, such as reading comprehension. To close this gap, we analyze the influence of multi-task learning strategies using task families for the English abstractive text summarization task. We group tasks into one of three strategies, i.e., sequential, simultaneous, and continual multi-task learning, and evaluate trained models through two downstream tasks. We find that certain combinations of task families (e.g., advanced reading comprehension and natural language inference) positively impact downstream performance. Further, we find that choice and combinations of task families influence downstream performance more than the training scheme, supporting the use of task families for abstractive text summarization.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 68 of its 107 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2022.

Builds on

68 of 107 references.

References · 68

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  6. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  7. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  8. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  9. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  10. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  11. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  12. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
38 more
  1. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
  2. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  3. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  4. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  5. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  6. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
  7. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
  8. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,308
  9. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
  10. 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,100
  11. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,039
  12. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
  13. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 883
  14. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  15. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
  16. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
  17. 2020GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotionscited by 479
  18. 2018A Discourse-Aware Attention Model for Abstractive Summarization of Long Documentscited by 477
  19. 2019Multi-News: a Large-Scale Multi-Document Summarization Dataset and Abstractive Hierarchical Modelcited by 431
  20. 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 420
  21. 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 396
  22. 2015A Neural Attention Model for Abstractive Sentence Summarizationcited by 394
  23. 2018WiC: the Word-in-Context Dataset for Evaluating Context-Sensitive Meaning Representationscited by 370
  24. 2019Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks for Natural Language Understandingcited by 349
  25. 2018SWAG: A Large-Scale Adversarial Dataset for Grounded Commonsense Inferencecited by 333
  26. 2019Cosmos QA: Machine Reading Comprehension with Contextual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 281
  27. 2019ERNIE 2.0: A Continual Pre-training Framework for Language Understandingcited by 230
  28. 2018Sentence Encoders on STILTs: Supplementary Training on Intermediate Labeled-data Taskscited by 214
  29. 2018ReCoRD: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Commonsense Reading Comprehensioncited by 198
  30. 2021Muppet: Massive Multi-task Representations with Pre-Finetuningcited by 192
  31. 2021ExT5: Towards Extreme Multi-Task Scaling for Transfer Learningcited by 161
  32. 2020Continual Lifelong Learning in Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 152
  33. 2020Re-evaluating Evaluation in Text Summarizationcited by 144
  34. 2020Exploring and Predicting Transferability across NLP Taskscited by 126
  35. 2019BillSum: A Corpus for Automatic Summarization of US Legislationcited by 117
  36. 2019Semantics-aware BERT for Language Understandingcited by 111
  37. 2018Abstractive Summarization of Reddit Posts with Multi-level Memory Networkscited by 102
  38. 2020CTRLsum: Towards Generic Controllable Text Summarizationcited by 98

50 most cited of 68 All 68 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

3 papers.