Leveraging Affirmative Interpretations from Negation Improves Natural Language Understanding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Negation poses a challenge in many natural language understanding tasks. Inspired by the fact that understanding a negated statement often requires humans to infer affirmative interpretations, in this paper we show that doing so benefits models for three natural language understanding tasks. We present an automated procedure to collect pairs of sentences with negation and their affirmative interpretations, resulting in over 150,000 pairs. Experimental results show that leveraging these pairs helps (a) T5 generate affirmative interpretations from negations in a previous benchmark, and (b) a RoBERTa-based classifier solve the task of natural language inference. We also leverage our pairs to build a plug-and-play neural generator that given a negated statement generates an affirmative interpretation. Then, we incorporate the pretrained generator into a RoBERTa-based classifier for sentiment analysis and show that doing so improves the results. Crucially, our proposal does not require any manual effort.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2022.
Builds on
24 of 60 references.
References · 24
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
- 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
- 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
- 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 709
- 2020Beyond English-Centric Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 559
12 more
- 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 317
- 2019Negated and Misprimed Probes for Pretrained Language Models: Birds Can Talk, But Cannot Flycited by 240
- 2019WikiMatrix: Mining 135M Parallel Sentences in 1620 Language Pairs from Wikipediacited by 221
- 2018Stress Test Evaluation for Natural Language Inferencecited by 211
- 2019CCMatrix: Mining Billions of High-Quality Parallel Sentences on the WEBcited by 177
- 2020Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metricscited by 155
- 2021Understanding by Understanding Not: Modeling Negation in Language Modelscited by 73
- 2022An Analysis of Negation in Natural Language Understanding Corporacited by 39
- 2018Do Language Models Understand Anything? On the Ability of LSTMs to Understand Negative Polarity Itemscited by 36
- 2021"I'm Not Mad": Commonsense Implications of Negation and Contradictioncited by 26
- 2022Not another Negation Benchmark: The NaN-NLI Test Suite for Sub-clausal Negationcited by 24
- 2022A Question-Answer Driven Approach to Reveal Affirmative Interpretations from Verbal Negationscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2023Language models are not naysayers: An analysis of language models on negation benchmarkscited by 73
- 2024Investigating and Addressing Hallucinations of LLMs in Tasks Involving Negationcited by 15
- 2024Paraphrasing in Affirmative Terms Improves Negation Understandingcited by 7
- 2025Thunder-NUBench: A Benchmark for LLMs' Sentence-Level Negation Understandingcited by 5
- 2025QueryBandits for Hallucination Mitigation: Exploiting Semantic Features for No-Regret Rewritingcited by 1
- 2026No One Size Fits All: QueryBandits for Hallucination Mitigationcited by 0
- 2026Not all Negation Cues are Equal: Affixal Negations Yield Better Negation Understandingcited by 0
- 2026Not all Negation Cues are Equal: Affixal Negations Yield Better Negation Understanding12 Sep 2026
- 2026No One Size Fits All: QueryBandits for Hallucination Mitigation23 Feb 2026
- 2025QueryBandits for Hallucination Mitigation: Exploiting Semantic Features for No-Regret Rewriting22 Aug 2025
- 2025Thunder-NUBench: A Benchmark for LLMs' Sentence-Level Negation Understanding17 Jun 2025
- 2024Paraphrasing in Affirmative Terms Improves Negation Understanding11 Jun 2024
- 2024Investigating and Addressing Hallucinations of LLMs in Tasks Involving Negation8 Jun 2024
- 2023Language models are not naysayers: An analysis of language models on negation benchmarks14 Jun 2023