A Question-Answer Driven Approach to Reveal Affirmative Interpretations from Verbal Negations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper explores a question-answer driven approach to reveal affirmative interpretations from verbal negations (i.e., when a negation cue grammatically modifies a verb). We create a new corpus consisting of 4,472 verbal negations and discover that 67.1% of them convey that an event actually occurred. Annotators generate and answer 7,277 questions for the 3,001 negations that convey an affirmative interpretation. We first cast the problem of revealing affirmative interpretations from negations as a natural language inference (NLI) classification task. Experimental results show that state-of-the-art transformers trained with existing NLI corpora are insufficient to reveal affirmative interpretations. We also observe, however, that fine-tuning brings small improvements. In addition to NLI classification, we also explore the more realistic task of generating affirmative interpretations directly from negations with the T5 transformer. We conclude that the generation task remains a challenge as T5 substantially underperforms humans.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2022.
Builds on
9 of 38 references.
References · 9
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
- 2016How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generationcited by 356
- 2018Large-Scale QA-SRL Parsingcited by 45
- 2021"I'm Not Mad": Commonsense Implications of Negation and Contradictioncited by 26
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022Leveraging Affirmative Interpretations from Negation Improves Natural Language Understandingcited by 7
- 2024Paraphrasing in Affirmative Terms Improves Negation Understandingcited by 7
- 2025Thunder-NUBench: A Benchmark for LLMs' Sentence-Level Negation Understandingcited by 5
- 2023Full Automation of Goal-driven LLM Dialog Threads with And-Or Recursors and Refiner Oraclescited by 2
- 2026Thunder-KoNUBench: A Corpus-Aligned Benchmark for Korean Negation Understandingcited by 0
- 2026Thunder-KoNUBench: A Corpus-Aligned Benchmark for Korean Negation Understanding8 Jan 2026
- 2025Thunder-NUBench: A Benchmark for LLMs' Sentence-Level Negation Understanding17 Jun 2025
- 2024Paraphrasing in Affirmative Terms Improves Negation Understanding11 Jun 2024
- 2023Full Automation of Goal-driven LLM Dialog Threads with And-Or Recursors and Refiner Oracles24 Jun 2023
- 2022Leveraging Affirmative Interpretations from Negation Improves Natural Language Understanding26 Oct 2022