mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optimizing Pessimism in Dynamic Treatment Regimes: A Bayesian Learning Approach

arXiv 2210.14420 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2022stat.ML cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this article, we propose a novel pessimism-based Bayesian learning method for optimal dynamic treatment regimes in the offline setting. When the coverage condition does not hold, which is common for offline data, the existing solutions would produce sub-optimal policies. The pessimism principle addresses this issue by discouraging recommendation of actions that are less explored conditioning on the state. However, nearly all pessimism-based methods rely on a key hyper-parameter that quantifies the degree of pessimism, and the performance of the methods can be highly sensitive to the choice of this parameter. We propose to integrate the pessimism principle with Thompson sampling and Bayesian machine learning for optimizing the degree of pessimism. We derive a credible set whose boundary uniformly lower bounds the optimal Q-function, and thus we do not require additional tuning of the degree of pessimism. We develop a general Bayesian learning method that works with a range of models, from Bayesian linear basis model to Bayesian neural network model. We develop the computational algorithm based on variational inference, which is highly efficient and scalable. We establish the theoretical guarantees of the proposed method, and show empirically that it outperforms the existing state-of-the-art solutions through both simulations and a real data example.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2022.

Builds on

25 of 66 references.

References · 25

  1. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  2. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
  3. 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,227
  4. 2019Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reductioncited by 833
  5. 2019Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 654
  6. 2020MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy Optimizationcited by 630
  7. 2020MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 582
  8. 2020Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?cited by 362
  9. 2021Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 267
  10. 2022A Survey on Offline Reinforcement Learning: Taxonomy, Review, and Open Problemscited by 228
  11. 2021Pessimistic Model-based Offline Reinforcement Learning under Partial Coveragecited by 160
  12. 2022Pessimistic Bootstrapping for Uncertainty-Driven Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 125
13 more
  1. 2021Provable Benefits of Actor-Critic Methods for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 109
  2. 2020The Importance of Pessimism in Fixed-Dataset Policy Optimizationcited by 99
  3. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning for Sepsis Treatmentcited by 71
  4. 2017Frequentist Consistency of Variational Bayescited by 60
  5. 2021Near-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning via Double Variance Reductioncited by 56
  6. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning as Anti-Explorationcited by 44
  7. 2021Proximal Learning for Individualized Treatment Regimes Under Unmeasured Confoundingcited by 21
  8. 2022Offline Reinforcement Learning with Instrumental Variables in Confounded Markov Decision Processescited by 19
  9. 2017Selective inference for effect modification via the lassocited by 12
  10. 2014On Estimation of Optimal Treatment Regimes For Maximizing t-Year Survival Probabilitycited by 9
  11. 2018A Parsimonious Personalized Dose Finding Model via Dimension Reductioncited by 6
  12. 2021Jump Interval-Learning for Individualized Decision Makingcited by 5
  13. 2020Representation Learning for Integrating Multi-domain Outcomes to Optimize Individualized Treatmentscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

7 papers.