mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Better Intent Representations for Financial Open Intent Classification

arXiv 2210.14304 ↗First posted 25 Oct 2022cs.CL q-fin.CPcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the recent surge of NLP technologies in the financial domain, banks and other financial entities have adopted virtual agents (VA) to assist customers. A challenging problem for VAs in this domain is determining a user's reason or intent for contacting the VA, especially when the intent was unseen or open during the VA's training. One method for handling open intents is adaptive decision boundary (ADB) post-processing, which learns tight decision boundaries from intent representations to separate known and open intents. We propose incorporating two methods for supervised pre-training of intent representations: prefix-tuning and fine-tuning just the last layer of a large language model (LLM). With this proposal, our accuracy is 1.63% - 2.07% higher than the prior state-of-the-art ADB method for open intent classification on the banking77 benchmark amongst others. Notably, we only supplement the original ADB model with 0.1% additional trainable parameters. Ablation studies also determine that our method yields better results than full fine-tuning the entire model. We hypothesize that our findings could stimulate a new optimal method of downstream tuning that combines parameter efficient tuning modules with fine-tuning a subset of the base model's layers.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2022.

Builds on

25 of 34 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  4. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  5. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  6. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  7. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  8. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,254
  9. 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 872
  10. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
  11. 2020Efficient Intent Detection with Dual Sentence Encoderscited by 433
  12. 2019An Evaluation Dataset for Intent Classification and Out-of-Scope Predictioncited by 386
13 more
  1. 2021On the Effectiveness of Adapter-based Tuning for Pretrained Language Model Adaptationcited by 147
  2. 2017DOC: Deep Open Classification of Text Documentscited by 109
  3. 2019A Stack-Propagation Framework with Token-Level Intent Detection for Spoken Language Understandingcited by 107
  4. 2019A Novel Bi-directional Interrelated Model for Joint Intent Detection and Slot Fillingcited by 85
  5. 2018Joint Slot Filling and Intent Detection via Capsule Neural Networkscited by 73
  6. 2019Deep Unknown Intent Detection with Margin Losscited by 66
  7. 2020Deep Open Intent Classification with Adaptive Decision Boundarycited by 56
  8. 2018Zero-shot User Intent Detection via Capsule Neural Networkscited by 54
  9. 2021Few-Shot Intent Detection via Contrastive Pre-Training and Fine-Tuningcited by 46
  10. 2021Out-of-Scope Intent Detection with Self-Supervision and Discriminative Trainingcited by 42
  11. 2022Learning Discriminative Representations and Decision Boundaries for Open Intent Detectioncited by 15
  12. 2016Unsupervised Dialogue Act Induction using Gaussian Mixturescited by 6
  13. 2020Simulating the Effects of Social Presence on Trust, Privacy Concerns & Usage Intentions in Automated Bots for Financecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3.

3 papers.