mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Federated Calibration and Evaluation of Binary Classifiers

arXiv 2210.12526 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2022cs.CR cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We address two major obstacles to practical use of supervised classifiers on distributed private data. Whether a classifier was trained by a federation of cooperating clients or trained centrally out of distribution, (1) the output scores must be calibrated, and (2) performance metrics must be evaluated -- all without assembling labels in one place. In particular, we show how to perform calibration and compute precision, recall, accuracy and ROC-AUC in the federated setting under three privacy models (i) secure aggregation, (ii) distributed differential privacy, (iii) local differential privacy. Our theorems and experiments clarify tradeoffs between privacy, accuracy, and data efficiency. They also help decide whether a given application has sufficient data to support federated calibration and evaluation.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2022.

Builds on

18 of 35 references.

References · 18

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  3. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  4. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  5. 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 536
  6. 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 390
  7. 2021The Skellam Mechanism for Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 68
  8. 2020Local Differential Privacy and Its Applications: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 41
  9. 2014Differential Privacy: An Economic Method for Choosing Epsiloncited by 35
  10. 2020Private Summation in the Multi-Message Shuffle Modelcited by 34
  11. 2019Towards Formalizing the GDPR's Notion of Singling Outcited by 26
  12. 2018Locally Private Mean Estimation: Z-test and Tight Confidence Intervalscited by 15
6 more
  1. 2018Answering Range Queries Under Local Differential Privacycited by 12
  2. 2014Differentially Private Algorithms for Empirical Machine Learningcited by 8
  3. 2019Private Protocols for U-Statistics in the Local Model and Beyondcited by 7
  4. 2022DPAUC: Differentially Private AUC Computation in Federated Learningcited by 7
  5. 2020Answering Multi-Dimensional Range Queries under Local Differential Privacycited by 3
  6. 2022Differentially Private AUC Computation in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

5 papers.