Answering Range Queries Under Local Differential Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Counting the fraction of a population having an input within a specified interval i.e. a range query, is a fundamental data analysis primitive. Range queries can also be used to compute other interesting statistics such as quantiles, and to build prediction models. However, frequently the data is subject to privacy concerns when it is drawn from individuals, and relates for example to their financial, health, religious or political status. In this paper, we introduce and analyze methods to support range queries under the local variant of differential privacy, an emerging standard for privacy-preserving data analysis. The local model requires that each user releases a noisy view of her private data under a privacy guarantee. While many works address the problem of range queries in the trusted aggregator setting, this problem has not been addressed specifically under untrusted aggregation (local DP) model even though many primitives have been developed recently for estimating a discrete distribution. We describe and analyze two classes of approaches for range queries, based on hierarchical histograms and the Haar wavelet transform. We show that both have strong theoretical accuracy guarantees on variance. In practice, both methods are fast and require minimal computation and communication resources. Our experiments show that the wavelet approach is most accurate in high privacy settings, while the hierarchical approach dominates for weaker privacy requirements.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
12 papers.
- 2022Improved Differential Privacy for SGD via Optimal Private Linear Operators on Adaptive Streamscited by 59
- 2021Frequency Estimation Under Multiparty Differential Privacy: One-shot and Streamingcited by 8
- 2022Federated Calibration and Evaluation of Binary Classifierscited by 5
- 2021Causally Constrained Data Synthesis for Private Data Releasecited by 3
- 2026How Much is Left? LLMs Linearly Encode Their Remaining Output Lengthcited by 2
- 2021Locally Differentially Private Bayesian Inferencecited by 1
- 2025Data Poisoning Attacks to Locally Differentially Private Range Query Protocolscited by 1
- 2025Consistent Estimation of Numerical Distributions under Local Differential Privacy by Wavelet Expansioncited by 1
- 2021HydraGAN A Multi-head, Multi-objective Approach to Synthetic Data Generationcited by 0
- 2021Federated Learning with Superquantile Aggregation for Heterogeneous Datacited by 0
- 2025Federated Computation of ROC and PR Curvescited by 0
- 2026Jacobian-Guided Anisotropic Noise Reshaping for Enhancing Representation Utility under Local Differential Privacycited by 0
- 2026How Much is Left? LLMs Linearly Encode Their Remaining Output Length6 Jul 2026
- 2026Jacobian-Guided Anisotropic Noise Reshaping for Enhancing Representation Utility under Local Differential Privacy16 May 2026
- 2025Federated Computation of ROC and PR Curves6 Oct 2025
- 2025Consistent Estimation of Numerical Distributions under Local Differential Privacy by Wavelet Expansion24 Sep 2025
- 2025Data Poisoning Attacks to Locally Differentially Private Range Query Protocols5 Mar 2025
- 2022Federated Calibration and Evaluation of Binary Classifiers22 Oct 2022
- 2022Improved Differential Privacy for SGD via Optimal Private Linear Operators on Adaptive Streams16 Feb 2022
- 2021Federated Learning with Superquantile Aggregation for Heterogeneous Data17 Dec 2021
- 2021HydraGAN A Multi-head, Multi-objective Approach to Synthetic Data Generation13 Nov 2021
- 2021Locally Differentially Private Bayesian Inference27 Oct 2021
- 2021Causally Constrained Data Synthesis for Private Data Release27 May 2021
- 2021Frequency Estimation Under Multiparty Differential Privacy: One-shot and Streaming5 Apr 2021