ADDMU: Detection of Far-Boundary Adversarial Examples with Data and Model Uncertainty Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial Examples Detection (AED) is a crucial defense technique against adversarial attacks and has drawn increasing attention from the Natural Language Processing (NLP) community. Despite the surge of new AED methods, our studies show that existing methods heavily rely on a shortcut to achieve good performance. In other words, current search-based adversarial attacks in NLP stop once model predictions change, and thus most adversarial examples generated by those attacks are located near model decision boundaries. To surpass this shortcut and fairly evaluate AED methods, we propose to test AED methods with Far Boundary (FB) adversarial examples. Existing methods show worse than random guess performance under this scenario. To overcome this limitation, we propose a new technique, ADDMU, adversary detection with data and model uncertainty, which combines two types of uncertainty estimation for both regular and FB adversarial example detection. Our new method outperforms previous methods by 3.6 and 6.0 AUC points under each scenario. Finally, our analysis shows that the two types of uncertainty provided by ADDMU can be leveraged to characterize adversarial examples and identify the ones that contribute most to model's robustness in adversarial training.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2022.
Builds on
41 of 55 references.
References · 41
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
- 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 663
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 568
- 2021Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processingcited by 526
29 more
- 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
- 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 422
- 2018TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applicationscited by 376
- 2020BAE: BERT-based Adversarial Examples for Text Classificationcited by 316
- 2016Adversarial Training Methods for Semi-Supervised Text Classificationcited by 280
- 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 280
- 2019FreeLB: Enhanced Adversarial Training for Natural Language Understandingcited by 261
- 2017Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifactscited by 244
- 2018Understanding Measures of Uncertainty for Adversarial Example Detectioncited by 177
- 2019Certified Robustness to Adversarial Word Substitutionscited by 164
- 2019Combating Adversarial Misspellings with Robust Word Recognitioncited by 162
- 2019Achieving Verified Robustness to Symbol Substitutions via Interval Bound Propagationcited by 87
- 2020Reevaluating Adversarial Examples in Natural Languagecited by 83
- 2020Robustness Verification for Transformerscited by 76
- 2019The Odds are Odd: A Statistical Test for Detecting Adversarial Examplescited by 75
- 2020SAFER: A Structure-free Approach for Certified Robustness to Adversarial Word Substitutionscited by 72
- 2019Learning to Discriminate Perturbations for Blocking Adversarial Attacks in Text Classificationcited by 55
- 2021Searching for an Effective Defender: Benchmarking Defense against Adversarial Word Substitutioncited by 55
- 2020Frequency-Guided Word Substitutions for Detecting Textual Adversarial Examplescited by 54
- 2020Better Robustness by More Coverage: Adversarial Training with Mixup Augmentation for Robust Fine-tuningcited by 39
- 2022Detection of Word Adversarial Examples in Text Classification: Benchmark and Baseline via Robust Density Estimationcited by 32
- 2020Defense against Adversarial Attacks in NLP via Dirichlet Neighborhood Ensemblecited by 26
- 2020A General Framework For Detecting Anomalous Inputs to DNN Classifierscited by 24
- 2022"That Is a Suspicious Reaction!": Interpreting Logits Variation to Detect NLP Adversarial Attackscited by 24
- 2020On the Robustness of Language Encoders against Grammatical Errorscited by 18
- 2021Detecting Textual Adversarial Examples through Randomized Substitution and Votecited by 8
- 2022Identifying Adversarial Attacks on Text Classifierscited by 4
- 2020TextAttack: Lessons learned in designing Python frameworks for NLPcited by 3
- 2022Input-specific Attention Subnetworks for Adversarial Detectioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.