Out of Distribution Reasoning by Weakly-Supervised Disentangled Logic Variational Autoencoder
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, i.e., finding test samples derived from a different distribution than the training set, as well as reasoning about such samples (OOD reasoning), are necessary to ensure the safety of results generated by machine learning models. Recently there have been promising results for OOD detection in the latent space of variational autoencoders (VAEs). However, without disentanglement, VAEs cannot perform OOD reasoning. Disentanglement ensures a one- to-many mapping between generative factors of OOD (e.g., rain in image data) and the latent variables to which they are encoded. Although previous literature has focused on weakly-supervised disentanglement on simple datasets with known and independent generative factors. In practice, achieving full disentanglement through weak supervision is impossible for complex datasets, such as Carla, with unknown and abstract generative factors. As a result, we propose an OOD reasoning framework that learns a partially disentangled VAE to reason about complex datasets. Our framework consists of three steps: partitioning data based on observed generative factors, training a VAE as a logic tensor network that satisfies disentanglement rules, and run-time OOD reasoning. We evaluate our approach on the Carla dataset and compare the results against three state-of-the-art methods. We found that our framework outperformed these methods in terms of disentanglement and end-to-end OOD reasoning.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2022.
Builds on
22 of 32 references.
References · 22
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
- 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
- 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
- 2020Weakly-Supervised Disentanglement Without Compromisescited by 237
- 2020Logic Tensor Networkscited by 197
- 2018Isolating Sources of Disentanglement in Variational Autoencoderscited by 167
- 2017Multi-Level Variational Autoencoder: Learning Disentangled Representations from Grouped Observationscited by 100
- 2019Weakly Supervised Disentanglement with Guaranteescited by 82
- 2018q-Space Novelty Detection with Variational Autoencoderscited by 22
10 more
- 2019Weakly Supervised Disentanglement by Pairwise Similaritiescited by 22
- 2017Learning Deep Latent Spaces for Multi-Label Classificationcited by 21
- 2021Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detection Using Latent Space of β-VAE for Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 19
- 2018Interpretable Latent Spaces for Learning from Demonstrationcited by 8
- 2020Learning from Demonstration with Weakly Supervised Disentanglementcited by 8
- 2019Towards Safe Machine Learning for CPS: Infer Uncertainty from Training Datacited by 5
- 2018Constraint-Based Visual Generationcited by 4
- 2022Design Methodology for Deep Out-of-Distribution Detectors in Real-Time Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 4
- 2019Likelihood Assignment for Out-of-Distribution Inputs in Deep Generative Models is Sensitive to Prior Distribution Choicecited by 1
- 2020On the Transferability of VAE Embeddings using Relational Knowledge with Semi-Supervisioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.