mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Less Generalizable Patterns with an Asymmetrically Trained Double Classifier for Better Test-Time Adaptation

arXiv 2210.09834 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks often fail to generalize outside of their training distribution, in particular when only a single data domain is available during training. While test-time adaptation has yielded encouraging results in this setting, we argue that, to reach further improvements, these approaches should be combined with training procedure modifications aiming to learn a more diverse set of patterns. Indeed, test-time adaptation methods usually have to rely on a limited representation because of the shortcut learning phenomenon: only a subset of the available predictive patterns is learned with standard training. In this paper, we first show that the combined use of existing training-time strategies, and test-time batch normalization, a simple adaptation method, does not always improve upon the test-time adaptation alone on the PACS benchmark. Furthermore, experiments on Office-Home show that very few training-time methods improve upon standard training, with or without test-time batch normalization. We therefore propose a novel approach using a pair of classifiers and a shortcut patterns avoidance loss that mitigates the shortcut learning behavior by reducing the generalization ability of the secondary classifier, using the additional shortcut patterns avoidance loss that encourages the learning of samples specific patterns. The primary classifier is trained normally, resulting in the learning of both the natural and the more complex, less generalizable, features. Our experiments show that our method improves upon the state-of-the-art results on both benchmarks and benefits the most to test-time batch normalization.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2022.

Builds on

36 of 44 references.

References · 36

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  3. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
  4. 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,309
  5. 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,181
  6. 2017CyCADA: Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 1,079
  7. 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,042
  8. 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 983
  9. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  10. 2017Learning to Generalize: Meta-Learning for Domain Generalizationcited by 762
  11. 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 737
  12. 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 655
24 more
  1. 2018Generalizing to Unseen Domains via Adversarial Data Augmentationcited by 451
  2. 2019Domain Generalization by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 449
  3. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
  4. 2020Self-Challenging Improves Cross-Domain Generalizationcited by 426
  5. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 376
  6. 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 349
  7. 2020Gradient Starvation: A Learning Proclivity in Neural Networkscited by 262
  8. 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 235
  9. 2020Training independent subnetworks for robust predictioncited by 177
  10. 2021Learning to Diversify for Single Domain Generalizationcited by 170
  11. 2021The Low-Rank Simplicity Bias in Deep Networkscited by 150
  12. 2020What shapes feature representations? Exploring datasets, architectures, and trainingcited by 125
  13. 2022Exact Feature Distribution Matching for Arbitrary Style Transfer and Domain Generalizationcited by 122
  14. 2020Maximum-Entropy Adversarial Data Augmentation for Improved Generalization and Robustnesscited by 121
  15. 2018Invariant Representations without Adversarial Trainingcited by 111
  16. 2022NICO++: Towards Better Benchmarking for Domain Generalizationcited by 86
  17. 2018Style Augmentation: Data Augmentation via Style Randomizationcited by 79
  18. 2015Learning with a Strong Adversarycited by 68
  19. 2020Informative Dropout for Robust Representation Learning: A Shape-bias Perspectivecited by 57
  20. 2020Understanding Failures of Deep Networks via Robust Feature Extractioncited by 56
  21. 2020Revisiting Batch Normalization for Improving Corruption Robustnesscited by 55
  22. 2021Test-time Batch Statistics Calibration for Covariate Shiftcited by 50
  23. 2021MixNorm: Test-Time Adaptation Through Online Normalization Estimationcited by 47
  24. 2022Test-time Batch Normalizationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

3 papers.