Learning Control Admissibility Models with Graph Neural Networks for Multi-Agent Navigation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep reinforcement learning in continuous domains focuses on learning control policies that map states to distributions over actions that ideally concentrate on the optimal choices in each step. In multi-agent navigation problems, the optimal actions depend heavily on the agents' density. Their interaction patterns grow exponentially with respect to such density, making it hard for learning-based methods to generalize. We propose to switch the learning objectives from predicting the optimal actions to predicting sets of admissible actions, which we call control admissibility models (CAMs), such that they can be easily composed and used for online inference for an arbitrary number of agents. We design CAMs using graph neural networks and develop training methods that optimize the CAMs in the standard model-free setting, with the additional benefit of eliminating the need for reward engineering typically required to balance collision avoidance and goal-reaching requirements. We evaluate the proposed approach in multi-agent navigation environments. We show that the CAM models can be trained in environments with only a few agents and be easily composed for deployment in dense environments with hundreds of agents, achieving better performance than state-of-the-art methods.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2022.
Builds on
31 of 53 references.
References · 31
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,223
- 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
- 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,437
- 2017Deep Setscited by 1,394
- 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
- 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 561
- 2016Interaction Networks for Learning about Objects, Relations and Physicscited by 503
19 more
- 2019A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologiescited by 373
- 2019Control Barrier Functions: Theory and Applicationscited by 332
- 2017Inverse Reward Designcited by 246
- 2019Multi-Agent Pathfinding: Definitions, Variants, and Benchmarkscited by 197
- 2021Safe Nonlinear Control Using Robust Neural Lyapunov-Barrier Functionscited by 91
- 2018PRIMAL: Pathfinding via Reinforcement and Imitation Multi-Agent Learningcited by 89
- 2019Graph Neural Networks for Decentralized Multi-Robot Path Planningcited by 84
- 2018Searching with Consistent Prioritization for Multi-Agent Path Findingcited by 80
- 2021Learning Safe Multi-Agent Control with Decentralized Neural Barrier Certificatescited by 71
- 2019PIC: Permutation Invariant Critic for Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 46
- 2020Message-Aware Graph Attention Networks for Large-Scale Multi-Robot Path Planningcited by 41
- 2019Graph Policy Gradients for Large Scale Robot Controlcited by 27
- 2020GLAS: Global-to-Local Safe Autonomy Synthesis for Multi-Robot Motion Planning with End-to-End Learningcited by 21
- 2020Neural-Swarm: Decentralized Close-Proximity Multirotor Control Using Learned Interactionscited by 19
- 2020Multi-Robot Coverage and Exploration using Spatial Graph Neural Networkscited by 18
- 2021Graph Neural Networks for Decentralized Multi-Robot Submodular Action Selectioncited by 13
- 2020Graph Neural Networks for Motion Planningcited by 12
- 2014Probabilistic and Distributed Control of a Large-Scale Swarm of Autonomous Agentscited by 2
- 2018Approximating the Region of Multi-Task Coordination via the Optimal Lyapunov-Like Barrier Functioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2025Graphs Meet AI Agents: Taxonomy, Progress, and Future Opportunitiescited by 23
- 2023Online Control Barrier Functions for Decentralized Multi-Agent Navigationcited by 10
- 2024Co-Optimizing Reconfigurable Environments and Policies for Decentralized Multi-Agent Navigationcited by 4
- 2023Accelerating Multi-Agent Planning Using Graph Transformers with Bounded Suboptimalitycited by 3
- 2025Estimating Control Barriers from Offline Datacited by 3
- 2025Controllable Motion Generation via Diffusion Modal Couplingcited by 2
- 2025Reliable and Efficient Multi-Agent Coordination via Graph Neural Network Variational Autoencoderscited by 2
- 2026CollisionGAT: Controller-Agnostic One-Step Collision Screening for Multi-Agent Motioncited by 0
- 2026CollisionGAT: Controller-Agnostic One-Step Collision Screening for Multi-Agent Motion26 Sep 2026
- 2025Graphs Meet AI Agents: Taxonomy, Progress, and Future Opportunities22 Jun 2025
- 2025Reliable and Efficient Multi-Agent Coordination via Graph Neural Network Variational Autoencoders4 Mar 2025
- 2025Controllable Motion Generation via Diffusion Modal Coupling4 Mar 2025
- 2025Estimating Control Barriers from Offline Data21 Feb 2025
- 2024Co-Optimizing Reconfigurable Environments and Policies for Decentralized Multi-Agent Navigation21 Mar 2024
- 2023Online Control Barrier Functions for Decentralized Multi-Agent Navigation8 Mar 2023
- 2023Accelerating Multi-Agent Planning Using Graph Transformers with Bounded Suboptimality20 Jan 2023