Knowledge Tracing for Complex Problem Solving: Granular Rank-Based Tensor Factorization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Knowledge Tracing (KT), which aims to model student knowledge level and predict their performance, is one of the most important applications of user modeling. Modern KT approaches model and maintain an up-to-date state of student knowledge over a set of course concepts according to students' historical performance in attempting the problems. However, KT approaches were designed to model knowledge by observing relatively small problem-solving steps in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. While these approaches were applied successfully to model student knowledge by observing student solutions for simple problems, they do not perform well for modeling complex problem solving in students.M ost importantly, current models assume that all problem attempts are equally valuable in quantifying current student knowledge.However, for complex problems that involve many concepts at the same time, this assumption is deficient. In this paper, we argue that not all attempts are equivalently important in discovering students' knowledge state, and some attempts can be summarized together to better represent student performance. We propose a novel student knowledge tracing approach, Granular RAnk based TEnsor factorization (GRATE), that dynamically selects student attempts that can be aggregated while predicting students' performance in problems and discovering the concepts presented in them. Our experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate the improved performance of GRATE, compared to the state-of-the-art baselines, in the task of student performance prediction. Our further analysis shows that attempt aggregation eliminates the unnecessary fluctuations from students' discovered knowledge states and helps in discovering complex latent concepts in the problems.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2022.
Builds on
8 of 30 references.
References · 8
- 2015Deep Knowledge Tracingcited by 332
- 2020Context-Aware Attentive Knowledge Tracingcited by 174
- 2016Dynamic Key-Value Memory Networks for Knowledge Tracingcited by 171
- 2020Towards an Appropriate Query, Key, and Value Computation for Knowledge Tracingcited by 81
- 2018Addressing Two Problems in Deep Knowledge Tracing via Prediction-Consistent Regularizationcited by 55
- 2016Back to the Basics: Bayesian extensions of IRT outperform neural networks for proficiency estimationcited by 17
- 2014Tag-Aware Ordinal Sparse Factor Analysis for Learning and Content Analyticscited by 15
- 2020Modeling Knowledge Acquisition from Multiple Learning Resource Typescited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2.
5 papers.
- 20243DG: A Framework for Using Generative AI for Handling Sparse Learner Performance Data From Intelligent Tutoring Systemscited by 9
- 2024Predicting Learning Performance with Large Language Models: A Study in Adult Literacycited by 8
- 2024Data Augmentation for Sparse Multidimensional Learning Performance Data Using Generative AIcited by 3
- 2025Generative Data Imputation for Sparse Learner Performance Data Using Generative Adversarial Imputation Networkscited by 0
- 2025Improving Group Fairness in Tensor Completion via Imbalance Mitigating Entity Augmentationcited by 0
- 2025Improving Group Fairness in Tensor Completion via Imbalance Mitigating Entity Augmentation28 Jul 2025
- 2025Generative Data Imputation for Sparse Learner Performance Data Using Generative Adversarial Imputation Networks23 Mar 2025
- 2024Data Augmentation for Sparse Multidimensional Learning Performance Data Using Generative AI24 Sep 2024
- 2024Predicting Learning Performance with Large Language Models: A Study in Adult Literacy4 Mar 2024
- 20243DG: A Framework for Using Generative AI for Handling Sparse Learner Performance Data From Intelligent Tutoring Systems29 Jan 2024