mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient Cross-Modal Video Retrieval with Meta-Optimized Frames

arXiv 2210.08452 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2022cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cross-modal video retrieval aims to retrieve the semantically relevant videos given a text as a query, and is one of the fundamental tasks in Multimedia. Most of top-performing methods primarily leverage Visual Transformer (ViT) to extract video features [1, 2, 3], suffering from high computational complexity of ViT especially for encoding long videos. A common and simple solution is to uniformly sample a small number (say, 4 or 8) of frames from the video (instead of using the whole video) as input to ViT. The number of frames has a strong influence on the performance of ViT, e.g., using 8 frames performs better than using 4 frames yet needs more computational resources, resulting in a trade-off. To get free from this trade-off, this paper introduces an automatic video compression method based on a bilevel optimization program (BOP) consisting of both model-level (i.e., base-level) and frame-level (i.e., meta-level) optimizations. The model-level learns a cross-modal video retrieval model whose input is the "compressed frames" learned by frame-level optimization. In turn, the frame-level optimization is through gradient descent using the meta loss of video retrieval model computed on the whole video. We call this BOP method as well as the "compressed frames" as Meta-Optimized Frames (MOF). By incorporating MOF, the video retrieval model is able to utilize the information of whole videos (for training) while taking only a small number of input frames in actual implementation. The convergence of MOF is guaranteed by meta gradient descent algorithms. For evaluation, we conduct extensive experiments of cross-modal video retrieval on three large-scale benchmarks: MSR-VTT, MSVD, and DiDeMo. Our results show that MOF is a generic and efficient method to boost multiple baseline methods, and can achieve a new state-of-the-art performance.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2022.

Builds on

49 of 81 references.

References · 49

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  5. 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,862
  6. 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,609
  7. 2021Frozen in Time: A Joint Video and Image Encoder for End-to-End Retrievalcited by 1,175
  8. 2021Video Swin Transformercited by 1,090
  9. 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 944
  10. 2015NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognitioncited by 935
  11. 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 896
  12. 2017Localizing Moments in Video with Natural Languagecited by 660
37 more
  1. 2021CLIP4Clip: An Empirical Study of CLIP for End to End Video Clip Retrievalcited by 645
  2. 2019End-to-End Learning of Visual Representations from Uncurated Instructional Videoscited by 506
  3. 2021Less is More: ClipBERT for Video-and-Language Learning via Sparse Samplingcited by 484
  4. 2020Multi-modal Transformer for Video Retrievalcited by 395
  5. 2018How to train your MAMLcited by 306
  6. 2022X-CLIP: End-to-End Multi-grained Contrastive Learning for Video-Text Retrievalcited by 279
  7. 2020ActBERT: Learning Global-Local Video-Text Representationscited by 267
  8. 2018Dataset Distillationcited by 224
  9. 2021CLIP2Video: Mastering Video-Text Retrieval via Image CLIPcited by 223
  10. 2019Use What You Have: Video Retrieval Using Representations From Collaborative Expertscited by 214
  11. 2018A Joint Sequence Fusion Model for Video Question Answering and Retrievalcited by 208
  12. 2020Fine-grained Video-Text Retrieval with Hierarchical Graph Reasoningcited by 180
  13. 2020Support-set bottlenecks for video-text representation learningcited by 170
  14. 2015Sequence to Sequence -- Video to Textcited by 157
  15. 2020Adaptive Aggregation Networks for Class-Incremental Learningcited by 149
  16. 2022X-Pool: Cross-Modal Language-Video Attention for Text-Video Retrievalcited by 127
  17. 2017A Review on Bilevel Optimization: From Classical to Evolutionary Approaches and Applicationscited by 126
  18. 2021Improving Video-Text Retrieval by Multi-Stream Corpus Alignment and Dual Softmax Losscited by 116
  19. 2020AVLnet: Learning Audio-Visual Language Representations from Instructional Videoscited by 110
  20. 2019Self-Tuning Networks: Bilevel Optimization of Hyperparameters using Structured Best-Response Functionscited by 104
  21. 2022TS2-Net: Token Shift and Selection Transformer for Text-Video Retrievalcited by 104
  22. 2018Cross-Modal and Hierarchical Modeling of Video and Textcited by 103
  23. 2021T2VLAD: Global-Local Sequence Alignment for Text-Video Retrievalcited by 103
  24. 2021TACo: Token-aware Cascade Contrastive Learning for Video-Text Alignmentcited by 102
  25. 2022CenterCLIP: Token Clustering for Efficient Text-Video Retrievalcited by 86
  26. 2018Dual Encoding for Zero-Example Video Retrievalcited by 85
  27. 2021Deconfounded Video Moment Retrieval with Causal Interventioncited by 84
  28. 2022Disentangled Representation Learning for Text-Video Retrievalcited by 77
  29. 2021Token Shift Transformer for Video Classificationcited by 61
  30. 2021Efficient Video Transformers with Spatial-Temporal Token Selectioncited by 58
  31. 2021Object-aware Video-language Pre-training for Retrievalcited by 57
  32. 2020Tree-Augmented Cross-Modal Encoding for Complex-Query Video Retrievalcited by 47
  33. 2021HANet: Hierarchical Alignment Networks for Video-Text Retrievalcited by 31
  34. 2020SEA: Sentence Encoder Assembly for Video Retrieval by Textual Queriescited by 26
  35. 2014Dissimilarity-based Sparse Subset Selectioncited by 18
  36. 2022Condensing a Sequence to One Informative Frame for Video Recognitioncited by 6
  37. 2019AVD: Adversarial Video Distillationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.