mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hierarchical Policy Blending as Inference for Reactive Robot Control

arXiv 2210.07890 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2022cs.RO cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Motion generation in cluttered, dense, and dynamic environments is a central topic in robotics, rendered as a multi-objective decision-making problem. Current approaches trade-off between safety and performance. On the one hand, reactive policies guarantee fast response to environmental changes at the risk of suboptimal behavior. On the other hand, planning-based motion generation provides feasible trajectories, but the high computational cost may limit the control frequency and thus safety. To combine the benefits of reactive policies and planning, we propose a hierarchical motion generation method. Moreover, we adopt probabilistic inference methods to formalize the hierarchical model and stochastic optimization. We realize this approach as a weighted product of stochastic, reactive expert policies, where planning is used to adaptively compute the optimal weights over the task horizon. This stochastic optimization avoids local optima and proposes feasible reactive plans that find paths in cluttered and dense environments. Our extensive experimental study in planar navigation and 6DoF manipulation shows that our proposed hierarchical motion generation method outperforms both myopic reactive controllers and online re-planning methods.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2022.

Builds on

28 of 65 references.

References · 28

  1. 2018Reinforcement Learning and Control as Probabilistic Inference: Tutorial and Reviewcited by 482
  2. 2020Sample-efficient Cross-Entropy Method for Real-time Planningcited by 95
  3. 2015Distributed Gaussian Processescited by 84
  4. 2014Generalized Product of Experts for Automatic and Principled Fusion of Gaussian Process Predictionscited by 67
  5. 2020Long-Horizon Visual Planning with Goal-Conditioned Hierarchical Predictorscited by 62
  6. 2020Neural Dynamic Policies for End-to-End Sensorimotor Learningcited by 58
  7. 2017Continuous-Time Gaussian Process Motion Planning via Probabilistic Inferencecited by 49
  8. 2021STORM: An Integrated Framework for Fast Joint-Space Model-Predictive Control for Reactive Manipulationcited by 47
  9. 2018Riemannian Motion Policiescited by 46
  10. 2018Generalized Robust Bayesian Committee Machine for Large-scale Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 33
  11. 2020Stein Variational Model Predictive Controlcited by 30
  12. 2021Specializing Versatile Skill Libraries using Local Mixture of Expertscited by 24
16 more
  1. 2022Robot Learning of Mobile Manipulation with Reachability Behavior Priorscited by 22
  2. 2018RMPflow: A Computational Graph for Automatic Motion Policy Generationcited by 21
  3. 2022Learning Implicit Priors for Motion Optimizationcited by 20
  4. 2021Geometric Fabrics: Generalizing Classical Mechanics to Capture the Physics of Behaviorcited by 19
  5. 2020Continuous Action Reinforcement Learning from a Mixture of Interpretable Expertscited by 17
  6. 2021Hierarchical Neural Dynamic Policiescited by 17
  7. 2021Composable Energy Policies for Reactive Motion Generation and Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
  8. 2020Merging Position and Orientation Motion Primitivescited by 12
  9. 2020Generalized Nonlinear and Finsler Geometry for Roboticscited by 10
  10. 2021RMP2: A Structured Composable Policy Class for Robot Learningcited by 8
  11. 2020Geometric Fabrics for the Acceleration-based Design of Robotic Motioncited by 7
  12. 2019Riemannian Motion Policy Fusion through Learnable Lyapunov Function Reshapingcited by 6
  13. 2020Learning from demonstration using products of experts: applications to manipulation and task prioritizationcited by 4
  14. 2022Learning to Sequence and Blend Robot Skills via Differentiable Optimizationcited by 4
  15. 2015Transductive Log Opinion Pool of Gaussian Process Expertscited by 3
  16. 2022Actor-Critic based Improper Reinforcement Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 1.

8 papers.