mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quantifying Quality of Class-Conditional Generative Models in Time-Series Domain

arXiv 2210.07617 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative models are designed to address the data scarcity problem. Even with the exploding amount of data, due to computational advancements, some applications (e.g., health care, weather forecast, fault detection) still suffer from data insufficiency, especially in the time-series domain. Thus generative models are essential and powerful tools, but they still lack a consensual approach for quality assessment. Such deficiency hinders the confident application of modern implicit generative models on time-series data. Inspired by assessment methods on the image domain, we introduce the InceptionTime Score (ITS) and the Frechet InceptionTime Distance (FITD) to gauge the qualitative performance of class conditional generative models on the time-series domain. We conduct extensive experiments on 80 different datasets to study the discriminative capabilities of proposed metrics alongside two existing evaluation metrics: Train on Synthetic Test on Real (TSTR) and Train on Real Test on Synthetic (TRTS). Extensive evaluation reveals that the proposed assessment method, i.e., ITS and FITD in combination with TSTR, can accurately assess class-conditional generative model performance.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2022.

Builds on

11 of 21 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  2. 2019InceptionTime: Finding AlexNet for Time Series Classificationcited by 386
  3. 2017Real-valued (Medical) Time Series Generation with Recurrent Conditional GANscited by 329
  4. 2018Pros and Cons of GAN Evaluation Measurescited by 224
  5. 2017Generalization and Equilibrium in Generative Adversarial Nets (GANs)cited by 165
  6. 2019Classification Accuracy Score for Conditional Generative Modelscited by 134
  7. 2021Pros and Cons of GAN Evaluation Measures: New Developmentscited by 121
  8. 2018How good is my GAN?cited by 74
  9. 2020Conditional GAN for timeseries generationcited by 36
  10. 2018T-CGAN: Conditional Generative Adversarial Network for Data Augmentation in Noisy Time Series with Irregular Samplingcited by 29
  11. 2019Deep Hedging: Learning to Simulate Equity Option Marketscited by 25

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.