Context Generation Improves Open Domain Question Answering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Closed-book question answering (QA) requires a model to directly answer an open-domain question without access to any external knowledge. Prior work on closed-book QA either directly finetunes or prompts a pretrained language model (LM) to leverage the stored knowledge. However, they do not fully exploit the parameterized knowledge. To address this issue, we propose a two-stage, closed-book QA framework which employs a coarse-to-fine approach to extract relevant knowledge and answer a question. Our approach first generates a related context for a given question by prompting a pretrained LM. We then prompt the same LM for answer prediction using the generated context and the question. Additionally, to eliminate failure caused by context uncertainty, we marginalize over generated contexts. Experimental results on three QA benchmarks show that our method significantly outperforms previous closed-book QA methods (e.g. exact matching 68.6% vs. 55.3%), and is on par with open-book methods that exploit external knowledge sources (e.g. 68.6% vs. 68.0%). Our method is able to better exploit the stored knowledge in pretrained LMs without adding extra learnable parameters or needing finetuning, and paves the way for hybrid models that integrate pretrained LMs with external knowledge.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2022.
Builds on
28 of 42 references.
References · 28
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
- 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,141
16 more
- 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,936
- 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,868
- 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,210
- 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,202
- 2017Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questionscited by 777
- 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 719
- 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 695
- 2021Retrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversationcited by 692
- 2020KILT: a Benchmark for Knowledge Intensive Language Taskscited by 573
- 2022Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Modelcited by 559
- 2021PAQ: 65 Million Probably-Asked Questions and What You Can Do With Themcited by 200
- 2021Hurdles to Progress in Long-form Question Answeringcited by 167
- 2020The Curse of Dense Low-Dimensional Information Retrieval for Large Index Sizescited by 48
- 2022Read before Generate! Faithful Long Form Question Answering with Machine Readingcited by 47
- 2022Multi-Stage Prompting for Knowledgeable Dialogue Generationcited by 22
- 2020Studying Strategically: Learning to Mask for Closed-book QAcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Modelscited by 128
- 2023Towards Mitigating Hallucination in Large Language Models via Self-Reflectioncited by 81
- 2024TrustScore: Reference-Free Evaluation of LLM Response Trustworthinesscited by 19
- 2023Generative Data Augmentation using LLMs improves Distributional Robustness in Question Answeringcited by 6
- 2024R2GQA: Retriever-Reader-Generator Question Answering System to Support Students Understanding Legal Regulations in Higher Educationcited by 2
- 2025MAFA: A multi-agent framework for annotationcited by 2
- 2022Generative Long-form Question Answering: Relevance, Faithfulness and Succinctnesscited by 0
- 2025MAFA: A multi-agent framework for annotation19 May 2025
- 2024R2GQA: Retriever-Reader-Generator Question Answering System to Support Students Understanding Legal Regulations in Higher Education4 Sep 2024
- 2024TrustScore: Reference-Free Evaluation of LLM Response Trustworthiness19 Feb 2024
- 2023Towards Mitigating Hallucination in Large Language Models via Self-Reflection10 Oct 2023
- 2023Generative Data Augmentation using LLMs improves Distributional Robustness in Question Answering3 Sep 2023
- 2023On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Models23 May 2023
- 2022Generative Long-form Question Answering: Relevance, Faithfulness and Succinctness15 Nov 2022