mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Optimality Guarantees for Particle Belief Approximation of POMDPs

arXiv 2210.05015 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2022cs.AI cs.RO cs.SYcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) provide a flexible representation for real-world decision and control problems. However, POMDPs are notoriously difficult to solve, especially when the state and observation spaces are continuous or hybrid, which is often the case for physical systems. While recent online sampling-based POMDP algorithms that plan with observation likelihood weighting have shown practical effectiveness, a general theory characterizing the approximation error of the particle filtering techniques that these algorithms use has not previously been proposed. Our main contribution is bounding the error between any POMDP and its corresponding finite sample particle belief MDP (PB-MDP) approximation. This fundamental bridge between PB-MDPs and POMDPs allows us to adapt any sampling-based MDP algorithm to a POMDP by solving the corresponding particle belief MDP, thereby extending the convergence guarantees of the MDP algorithm to the POMDP. Practically, this is implemented by using the particle filter belief transition model as the generative model for the MDP solver. While this requires access to the observation density model from the POMDP, it only increases the transition sampling complexity of the MDP solver by a factor of O(C), where C is the number of particles. Thus, when combined with sparse sampling MDP algorithms, this approach can yield algorithms for POMDPs that have no direct theoretical dependence on the size of the state and observation spaces. In addition to our theoretical contribution, we perform five numerical experiments on benchmark POMDPs to demonstrate that a simple MDP algorithm adapted using PB-MDP approximation, Sparse-PFT, achieves performance competitive with other leading continuous observation POMDP solvers.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2022.

Builds on

10 of 43 references.

References · 10

  1. 2016DESPOT: Online POMDP Planning with Regularizationcited by 105
  2. 2017Online algorithms for POMDPs with continuous state, action, and observation spacescited by 82
  3. 2018Policy Optimization via Importance Samplingcited by 47
  4. 2014Online Planning Algorithms for POMDPscited by 42
  5. 2020Bayesian Optimized Monte Carlo Planningcited by 16
  6. 2020An On-Line POMDP Solver for Continuous Observation Spacescited by 15
  7. 2020Improving Automated Driving through POMDP Planning with Human Internal Statescited by 11
  8. 2021Compositional Learning-based Planning for Vision POMDPscited by 8
  9. 2019Sparse tree search optimality guarantees in POMDPs with continuous observation spacescited by 7
  10. 2020When is Particle Filtering Efficient for Planning in Partially Observed Linear Dynamical Systems?cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 6.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023BetaZero: Belief-State Planning for Long-Horizon POMDPs using Learned Approximationscited by 13
  2. 2023Online POMDP Planning with Anytime Deterministic Optimality Guaranteescited by 2
  3. 2023Simplifying Complex Observation Models in Continuous POMDP Planning with Probabilistic Guarantees and Practicecited by 2
  4. 2024Previous Knowledge Utilization In Online Anytime Belief Space Planningcited by 2
  5. 2026Online Risk-Averse Planning in POMDPs Using Iterated CVaR Value Functioncited by 2
  6. 2023Data Association Aware POMDP Planning with Hypothesis Pruning Performance Guaranteescited by 1
  7. 2025Partially Observable Monte-Carlo Graph Searchcited by 1
  8. 2025Active Measuring in Reinforcement Learning With Delayed Negative Effectscited by 1
  9. 2026Control Reinforcement Learning: Interpretable Token-Level Steering of LLMs via Sparse Autoencoder Featurescited by 1
  10. 2026SovereignPA-Bench: Evaluating User-Owned Personal Agents under Evolving Intent, Platform Mediation, and Consent Constraintscited by 1
  11. 2023Factored Online Planning in Many-Agent POMDPscited by 0
  12. 2024Belief-State Query Policies for User-Aligned POMDPscited by 0
8 more
  1. 2024Simplification of Risk Averse POMDPs with Performance Guaranteescited by 0
  2. 2024Anytime Probabilistically Constrained Provably Convergent Online Belief Space Planningcited by 0
  3. 2025Action-Gradient Monte Carlo Tree Search for Non-Parametric Continuous (PO)MDPscited by 0
  4. 2025Online Robust Planning under Model Uncertainty: A Sample-Based Approachcited by 0
  5. 2025Why Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning Works: Relation to Dual Controlcited by 0
  6. 2026Finite-Time Analysis of MCTS in Continuous POMDP Planningcited by 0
  7. 2026Scalable Rao-Blackwellized Online Planning for High-Dimensional POMDPscited by 0
  8. 2026Risk-Averse Online POMDP Planning via CVaR of the Immediate Cost with Performance Guaranteescited by 0