mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating the Performance of StyleGAN2-ADA on Medical Images

arXiv 2210.03786 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2022eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although generative adversarial networks (GANs) have shown promise in medical imaging, they have four main limitations that impeded their utility: computational cost, data requirements, reliable evaluation measures, and training complexity. Our work investigates each of these obstacles in a novel application of StyleGAN2-ADA to high-resolution medical imaging datasets. Our dataset is comprised of liver-containing axial slices from non-contrast and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans. Additionally, we utilized four public datasets composed of various imaging modalities. We trained a StyleGAN2 network with transfer learning (from the Flickr-Faces-HQ dataset) and data augmentation (horizontal flipping and adaptive discriminator augmentation). The network's generative quality was measured quantitatively with the Fr'echet Inception Distance (FID) and qualitatively with a visual Turing test given to seven radiologists and radiation oncologists. The StyleGAN2-ADA network achieved a FID of 5.22 (± 0.17) on our liver CT dataset. It also set new record FIDs of 10.78, 3.52, 21.17, and 5.39 on the publicly available SLIVER07, ChestX-ray14, ACDC, and Medical Segmentation Decathlon (brain tumors) datasets. In the visual Turing test, the clinicians rated generated images as real 42% of the time, approaching random guessing. Our computational ablation study revealed that transfer learning and data augmentation stabilize training and improve the perceptual quality of the generated images. We observed the FID to be consistent with human perceptual evaluation of medical images. Finally, our work found that StyleGAN2-ADA consistently produces high-quality results without hyperparameter searches or retraining.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2022.

Builds on

14 of 29 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
  2. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
  3. 2020Training Generative Adversarial Networks with Limited Datacited by 1,184
  4. 2021Alias-Free Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,181
  5. 2017ChestX-ray8: Hospital-scale Chest X-ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseasescited by 969
  6. 2017Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Networks to Guide Marker Discoverycited by 566
  7. 2019A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithmscited by 371
  8. 2017Are GANs Created Equal? A Large-Scale Studycited by 267
  9. 2018Pros and Cons of GAN Evaluation Measurescited by 224
  10. 2021GANs for Medical Image Synthesis: An Empirical Studycited by 64
  11. 2020Evaluating the Clinical Realism of Synthetic Chest X-Rays Generated Using Progressively Growing GANscited by 17
  12. 2021TarGAN: Target-Aware Generative Adversarial Networks for Multi-modality Medical Image Translationcited by 12
2 more
  1. 2021Unsupervised anomaly detection in digital pathology using GANscited by 7
  2. 2021Rapid treatment planning for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy with TP-GANcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

11 papers.