Class-wise and reduced calibration methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
For many applications of probabilistic classifiers it is important that the predicted confidence vectors reflect true probabilities (one says that the classifier is calibrated). It has been shown that common models fail to satisfy this property, making reliable methods for measuring and improving calibration important tools. Unfortunately, obtaining these is far from trivial for problems with many classes. We propose two techniques that can be used in tandem. First, a reduced calibration method transforms the original problem into a simpler one. We prove for several notions of calibration that solving the reduced problem minimizes the corresponding notion of miscalibration in the full problem, allowing the use of non-parametric recalibration methods that fail in higher dimensions. Second, we propose class-wise calibration methods, based on intuition building on a phenomenon called neural collapse and the observation that most of the accurate classifiers found in practice can be thought of as a union of K different functions which can be recalibrated separately, one for each class. These typically out-perform their non class-wise counterparts, especially for classifiers trained on imbalanced data sets. Applying the two methods together results in class-wise reduced calibration algorithms, which are powerful tools for reducing the prediction and per-class calibration errors. We demonstrate our methods on real and synthetic datasets and release all code as open source at https://github.com/appliedAI-Initiative
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2022.
Builds on
14 of 24 references.
References · 14
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
- 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
- 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 359
- 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 307
- 2015Evaluation of Deep Convolutional Nets for Document Image Classification and Retrievalcited by 212
- 2019Evaluating model calibration in classificationcited by 165
- 2021Neural Collapse Under MSE Loss: Proximity to and Dynamics on the Central Pathcited by 156
- 2020SOREL-20M: A Large Scale Benchmark Dataset for Malicious PE Detectioncited by 49
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Revisiting Reweighted Risk for Calibration: AURC, Focal, and Inverse Focal Losscited by 0
- 2025Scalable Utility-Aware Multiclass Calibrationcited by 0
- 2026Bandwidth Selection in Kernel Density Estimation for Model Calibrationcited by 0
- 2026Let Confidence Change, Not the Prediction: Prediction-Preserving Repair for Post-hoc Calibrationcited by 0
- 2026Let Confidence Change, Not the Prediction: Prediction-Preserving Repair for Post-hoc Calibration1 Sep 2026
- 2026Bandwidth Selection in Kernel Density Estimation for Model Calibration29 Jun 2026
- 2025Scalable Utility-Aware Multiclass Calibration29 Oct 2025
- 2025Revisiting Reweighted Risk for Calibration: AURC, Focal, and Inverse Focal Loss29 May 2025