mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Integrative Imaging Informatics for Cancer Research: Workflow Automation for Neuro-oncology (I3CR-WANO)

arXiv 2210.03151 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2022eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Efforts to utilize growing volumes of clinical imaging data to generate tumor evaluations continue to require significant manual data wrangling owing to the data heterogeneity. Here, we propose an artificial intelligence-based solution for the aggregation and processing of multisequence neuro-oncology MRI data to extract quantitative tumor measurements. Our end-to-end framework i) classifies MRI sequences using an ensemble classifier, ii) preprocesses the data in a reproducible manner, iii) delineates tumor tissue subtypes using convolutional neural networks, and iv) extracts diverse radiomic features. Moreover, it is robust to missing sequences and adopts an expert-in-the-loop approach, where the segmentation results may be manually refined by radiologists. Following the implementation of the framework in Docker containers, it was applied to two retrospective glioma datasets collected from the Washington University School of Medicine (WUSM; n = 384) and the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDA; n = 30) comprising preoperative MRI scans from patients with pathologically confirmed gliomas. The scan-type classifier yielded an accuracy of over 99%, correctly identifying sequences from 380/384 and 30/30 sessions from the WUSM and MDA datasets, respectively. Segmentation performance was quantified using the Dice Similarity Coefficient between the predicted and expert-refined tumor masks. Mean Dice scores were 0.882 (±0.244) and 0.977 (±0.04) for whole tumor segmentation for WUSM and MDA, respectively. This streamlined framework automatically curated, processed, and segmented raw MRI data of patients with varying grades of gliomas, enabling the curation of large-scale neuro-oncology datasets and demonstrating a high potential for integration as an assistive tool in clinical practice.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2022.

Builds on

6 of 40 references.

References · 6

  1. 2018Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challengecited by 508
  2. 2021The RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS 2021 Benchmark on Brain Tumor Segmentation and Radiogenomic Classificationcited by 507
  3. 2017NiftyNet: a deep-learning platform for medical imagingcited by 45
  4. 2021The Brain Tumor Sequence Registration (BraTS-Reg) Challenge: Establishing Correspondence Between Pre-Operative and Follow-up MRI Scans of Diffuse Glioma Patientscited by 32
  5. 2018DeepNeuro: an open-source deep learning toolbox for neuroimagingcited by 10
  6. 2018Classifying magnetic resonance image modalities with convolutional neural networkscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

3 papers.