mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Trust in Motion: Capturing Trust Ascendancy in Open-Source Projects using Hybrid AI

arXiv 2210.02656 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2022cs.SE cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Open-source is frequently described as a driver for unprecedented communication and collaboration, and the process works best when projects support teamwork. Yet, open-source cooperation processes in no way protect project contributors from considerations of trust, power, and influence. Indeed, achieving the level of trust necessary to contribute to a project and thus influence its direction is a constant process of change, and developers take many different routes over many communication channels to achieve it. We refer to this process of influence-seeking and trust-building as trust ascendancy. This paper describes a methodology for understanding the notion of trust ascendancy and introduces the capabilities that are needed to localize trust ascendancy operations happening over open-source projects. Much of the prior work in understanding trust in open-source software development has focused on a static view of the problem using different forms of quantity measures. However, trust ascendancy is not static, but rather adapts to changes in the open-source ecosystem in response to new input. This paper is the first attempt to articulate and study these signals from a dynamic view of the problem. In that respect, we identify related work that may help illuminate research challenges, implementation tradeoffs, and complementary solutions. Our preliminary results show the effectiveness of our method at capturing the trust ascendancy developed by individuals involved in a well-documented 2020 social engineering attack. Our future plans highlight research challenges and encourage cross-disciplinary collaboration to create more automated, accurate, and efficient ways to model and then track trust ascendancy in open-source projects.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2022.

Builds on

16 of 42 references.

References · 16

  1. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  2. 2020Temporal Graph Networks for Deep Learning on Dynamic Graphscited by 521
  3. 2016Diachronic Word Embeddings Reveal Statistical Laws of Semantic Changecited by 219
  4. 2019Persuasion for Good: Towards a Personalized Persuasive Dialogue System for Social Goodcited by 207
  5. 2014Statistically Significant Detection of Linguistic Changecited by 82
  6. 2017Dynamic Word Embeddingscited by 51
  7. 2017Dynamic Word Embeddings for Evolving Semantic Discoverycited by 38
  8. 2018dynnode2vec: Scalable Dynamic Network Embeddingcited by 32
  9. 2019Training Temporal Word Embeddings with a Compasscited by 22
  10. 2020Dynamic Contextualized Word Embeddingscited by 20
  11. 2015Learn on Source, Refine on Target:A Model Transfer Learning Framework with Random Forestscited by 6
  12. 2019ATTACK2VEC: Leveraging Temporal Word Embeddings to Understand the Evolution of Cyberattackscited by 6
4 more
  1. 2019Dynamic Network Embeddings for Network Evolution Analysiscited by 3
  2. 2017A Preliminary Analysis on the Effects of Propensity to Trust in Distributed Software Developmentcited by 2
  3. 2019Activity-Based Analysis of Open Source Software Contributors: Roles and Dynamicscited by 2
  4. 2022Dev2vec: Representing Domain Expertise of Developers in an Embedding Spacecited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.