Towards Flexible Inductive Bias via Progressive Reparameterization Scheduling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There are two de facto standard architectures in recent computer vision: Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformers (ViTs). Strong inductive biases of convolutions help the model learn sample effectively, but such strong biases also limit the upper bound of CNNs when sufficient data are available. On the contrary, ViT is inferior to CNNs for small data but superior for sufficient data. Recent approaches attempt to combine the strengths of these two architectures. However, we show these approaches overlook that the optimal inductive bias also changes according to the target data scale changes by comparing various models' accuracy on subsets of sampled ImageNet at different ratios. In addition, through Fourier analysis of feature maps, the model's response patterns according to signal frequency changes, we observe which inductive bias is advantageous for each data scale. The more convolution-like inductive bias is included in the model, the smaller the data scale is required where the ViT-like model outperforms the ResNet performance. To obtain a model with flexible inductive bias on the data scale, we show reparameterization can interpolate inductive bias between convolution and self-attention. By adjusting the number of epochs the model stays in the convolution, we show that reparameterization from convolution to self-attention interpolates the Fourier analysis pattern between CNNs and ViTs. Adapting these findings, we propose Progressive Reparameterization Scheduling (PRS), in which reparameterization adjusts the required amount of convolution-like or self-attention-like inductive bias per layer. For small-scale datasets, our PRS performs reparameterization from convolution to self-attention linearly faster at the late stage layer. PRS outperformed previous studies on the small-scale dataset, e.g., CIFAR-100.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2022.
Builds on
32 of 36 references.
References · 32
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
- 2021CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformerscited by 946
- 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 916
20 more
- 2021Going deeper with Image Transformerscited by 759
- 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 671
- 2021Transformer in Transformercited by 632
- 2021CoAtNet: Marrying Convolution and Attention for All Data Sizescited by 566
- 2021ConViT: Improving Vision Transformers with Soft Convolutional Inductive Biasescited by 484
- 2021Conditional Positional Encodings for Vision Transformerscited by 402
- 2021Early Convolutions Help Transformers See Bettercited by 395
- 2020Conditional Convolutions for Instance Segmentationcited by 314
- 2022How Do Vision Transformers Work?cited by 305
- 2019On the Relationship between Self-Attention and Convolutional Layerscited by 299
- 2021DeepViT: Towards Deeper Vision Transformercited by 288
- 2021Escaping the Big Data Paradigm with Compact Transformerscited by 261
- 2021Incorporating Convolution Designs into Visual Transformerscited by 248
- 2021LocalViT: Analyzing Locality in Vision Transformerscited by 228
- 2020FCOS: A simple and strong anchor-free object detectorcited by 171
- 2021A Survey of Visual Transformerscited by 117
- 2021ResT: An Efficient Transformer for Visual Recognitioncited by 79
- 2021Can Vision Transformers Perform Convolution?cited by 18
- 2021Blurs Behave Like Ensembles: Spatial Smoothings to Improve Accuracy, Uncertainty, and Robustnesscited by 14
- 2021Transformed CNNs: recasting pre-trained convolutional layers with self-attentioncited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
4 papers.
- 2022Towards Practical Plug-and-Play Diffusion Modelscited by 20
- 2023Navigating Scaling Laws: Compute Optimality in Adaptive Model Trainingcited by 4
- 2025Toward Onboard AI-Enabled Solutions to Space Object Detection for Space Sustainabilitycited by 2
- 2025Adaptive Voxel-Weighted Loss Using L1 Norms in Deep Neural Networks for Detection and Segmentation of Prostate Cancer Lesions in PET/CT Imagescited by 1
- 2025Toward Onboard AI-Enabled Solutions to Space Object Detection for Space Sustainability3 May 2025
- 2025Adaptive Voxel-Weighted Loss Using L1 Norms in Deep Neural Networks for Detection and Segmentation of Prostate Cancer Lesions in PET/CT Images4 Feb 2025
- 2023Navigating Scaling Laws: Compute Optimality in Adaptive Model Training6 Nov 2023
- 2022Towards Practical Plug-and-Play Diffusion Models12 Dec 2022