Online Self-Concordant and Relatively Smooth Minimization, With Applications to Online Portfolio Selection and Learning Quantum States
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Consider an online convex optimization problem where the loss functions are self-concordant barriers, smooth relative to a convex function h, and possibly non-Lipschitz. We analyze the regret of online mirror descent with h. Then, based on the result, we prove the following in a unified manner. Denote by T the time horizon and d the parameter dimension. 1. For online portfolio selection, the regret of widetildeEG, a variant of exponentiated gradient due to Helmbold et al., is tildeO ( T2/3 d1/3 ) when T > 4 d / log d. This improves on the original tildeO ( T3/4 d1/2 ) regret bound for widetildeEG. 2. For online portfolio selection, the regret of online mirror descent with the logarithmic barrier is tildeO(√T d). The regret bound is the same as that of Soft-Bayes due to Orseau et al. up to logarithmic terms. 3. For online learning quantum states with the logarithmic loss, the regret of online mirror descent with the log-determinant function is also tildeO ( √T d ). Its per-iteration time is shorter than all existing algorithms we know.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2022.
Builds on
13 of 41 references.
References · 13
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
- 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 407
- 2016Relatively-Smooth Convex Optimization by First-Order Methods, and Applicationscited by 108
- 2015Online Optimization : Competing with Dynamic Comparatorscited by 99
- 2016Improved Dynamic Regret for Non-degenerate Functionscited by 46
- 2018Online Learning of Quantum Statescited by 37
- 2018Efficient Online Portfolio with Logarithmic Regretcited by 20
- 2022Pushing the Efficiency-Regret Pareto Frontier for Online Learning of Portfolios and Quantum Statescited by 15
- 2022Adaptive Online Learning of Quantum Statescited by 12
- 2019Soft-Bayes: Prod for Mixtures of Experts with Log-Losscited by 10
- 2022Damped Online Newton Step for Portfolio Selectioncited by 9
- 2019Bandit Principal Component Analysiscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023Data-Dependent Bounds for Online Portfolio Selection Without Lipschitzness and Smoothnesscited by 11
- 2025Online Inverse Linear Optimization: Efficient Logarithmic-Regret Algorithm, Robustness to Suboptimality, and Lower Boundcited by 7
- 2024Generalized Exponentiated Gradient Algorithms and Their Application to On-Line Portfolio Selectioncited by 5
- 2022Faster Stochastic First-Order Method for Maximum-Likelihood Quantum State Tomographycited by 1
- 2023Fast Minimization of Expected Logarithmic Loss via Stochastic Dual Averagingcited by 1
- 2023Online Learning Quantum States with the Logarithmic Loss via VB-FTRLcited by 1
- 2026Sequential Capacity of Quantum Processes with Finite Memorycited by 0
- 2026Sequential Capacity of Quantum Processes with Finite Memory1 Oct 2026
- 2025Online Inverse Linear Optimization: Efficient Logarithmic-Regret Algorithm, Robustness to Suboptimality, and Lower Bound24 Jan 2025
- 2024Generalized Exponentiated Gradient Algorithms and Their Application to On-Line Portfolio Selection2 Jun 2024
- 2023Online Learning Quantum States with the Logarithmic Loss via VB-FTRL6 Nov 2023
- 2023Fast Minimization of Expected Logarithmic Loss via Stochastic Dual Averaging5 Nov 2023
- 2023Data-Dependent Bounds for Online Portfolio Selection Without Lipschitzness and Smoothness23 May 2023
- 2022Faster Stochastic First-Order Method for Maximum-Likelihood Quantum State Tomography23 Nov 2022