Soft-Bayes: Prod for Mixtures of Experts with Log-Loss
On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE theory and gating functions
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider prediction with expert advice under the log-loss with the goal of deriving efficient and robust algorithms. We argue that existing algorithms such as exponentiated gradient, online gradient descent and online Newton step do not adequately satisfy both requirements. Our main contribution is an analysis of the Prod algorithm that is robust to any data sequence and runs in linear time relative to the number of experts in each round. Despite the unbounded nature of the log-loss, we derive a bound that is independent of the largest loss and of the largest gradient, and depends only on the number of experts and the time horizon. Furthermore we give a Bayesian interpretation of Prod and adapt the algorithm to derive a tracking regret.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE theory and gating functions, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 2 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2019.
Builds on
2 of 24 references.
References · 2
- 2014A Second-order Bound with Excess Lossescited by 93
- 2016Efficient Second Order Online Learning by Sketchingcited by 33
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
10 papers.
- 2021Efficient First-Order Contextual Bandits: Prediction, Allocation, and Triangular Discriminationcited by 53
- 2022Pushing the Efficiency-Regret Pareto Frontier for Online Learning of Portfolios and Quantum Statescited by 15
- 2023Data-Dependent Bounds for Online Portfolio Selection Without Lipschitzness and Smoothnesscited by 11
- 2022Damped Online Newton Step for Portfolio Selectioncited by 9
- 2022Optimal Comparator Adaptive Online Learning with Switching Costcited by 9
- 2022Online Self-Concordant and Relatively Smooth Minimization, With Applications to Online Portfolio Selection and Learning Quantum Statescited by 7
- 2021Isotuning With Applications To Scale-Free Online Learningcited by 4
- 2023Projection-Free Online Convex Optimization via Efficient Newton Iterationscited by 4
- 2023Online Learning Quantum States with the Logarithmic Loss via VB-FTRLcited by 1
- 2025Bayesian Ensembling: Insights from Online Optimization and Empirical Bayescited by 0
- 2025Bayesian Ensembling: Insights from Online Optimization and Empirical Bayes21 May 2025
- 2023Online Learning Quantum States with the Logarithmic Loss via VB-FTRL6 Nov 2023
- 2023Projection-Free Online Convex Optimization via Efficient Newton Iterations19 Jun 2023
- 2023Data-Dependent Bounds for Online Portfolio Selection Without Lipschitzness and Smoothness23 May 2023
- 2022Online Self-Concordant and Relatively Smooth Minimization, With Applications to Online Portfolio Selection and Learning Quantum States3 Oct 2022
- 2022Optimal Comparator Adaptive Online Learning with Switching Cost13 May 2022
- 2022Damped Online Newton Step for Portfolio Selection15 Feb 2022
- 2022Pushing the Efficiency-Regret Pareto Frontier for Online Learning of Portfolios and Quantum States6 Feb 2022
- 2021Isotuning With Applications To Scale-Free Online Learning29 Dec 2021
- 2021Efficient First-Order Contextual Bandits: Prediction, Allocation, and Triangular Discrimination5 Jul 2021
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026On Bayesian Softmax-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Models
- 2024Beyond Parameter Count: Implicit Bias in Soft Mixture of Experts
- 2024Sigmoid Gating is More Sample Efficient than Softmax Gating in Mixture of Experts
- 2026Smoothing the Top-k Exposure Boundary for Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
- 2024Generalization Error Analysis for Sparse Mixture-of-Experts: A Preliminary Study
- 2020A similarity-based Bayesian mixture-of-experts model
- 2025Dendrograms of Mixing Measures for Softmax-Gated Gaussian Mixture of Experts: Consistency Without Model Sweeps
- 2025Mixture of Experts Provably Detect and Learn the Latent Cluster Structure in Gradient-Based Learning