Understanding Interventional TreeSHAP : How and Why it Works
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Shapley values are ubiquitous in interpretable Machine Learning due to their strong theoretical background and efficient implementation in the SHAP library. Computing these values previously induced an exponential cost with respect to the number of input features of an opaque model. Now, with efficient implementations such as Interventional TreeSHAP, this exponential burden is alleviated assuming one is explaining ensembles of decision trees. Although Interventional TreeSHAP has risen in popularity, it still lacks a formal proof of how/why it works. We provide such proof with the aim of not only increasing the transparency of the algorithm but also to encourage further development of these ideas. Notably, our proof for Interventional TreeSHAP is easily adapted to Shapley-Taylor indices and one-hot-encoded features.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2022.
Builds on
6 of 16 references.
References · 6
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
- 2022Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?cited by 199
- 2019The Shapley Taylor Interaction Indexcited by 143
- 2016Entity Embeddings of Categorical Variablescited by 87
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
2 papers.
- 2025From Decision Trees to Boolean Logic: A Fast and Unified SHAP Algorithmcited by 3
- 2023Conditional expectation network for SHAPcited by 0
- 2025From Decision Trees to Boolean Logic: A Fast and Unified SHAP Algorithm12 Nov 2025
- 2023Conditional expectation network for SHAP20 Jul 2023