mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How Does Return Distribution in Distributional Reinforcement Learning Help Optimization?

arXiv 2209.14513 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2022cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Distributional reinforcement learning, which focuses on learning the entire return distribution instead of only its expectation in standard RL, has demonstrated remarkable success in enhancing performance. Despite these advancements, our comprehension of how the return distribution within distributional RL still remains limited. In this study, we investigate the optimization advantages of distributional RL by utilizing its extra return distribution knowledge over classical RL within the Neural Fitted Z-Iteration~(Neural FZI) framework. To begin with, we demonstrate that the distribution loss of distributional RL has desirable smoothness characteristics and hence enjoys stable gradients, which is in line with its tendency to promote optimization stability. Furthermore, the acceleration effect of distributional RL is revealed by decomposing the return distribution. It shows that distributional RL can perform favorably if the return distribution approximation is appropriate, measured by the variance of gradient estimates in each environment. Rigorous experiments validate the stable optimization behaviors of distributional RL and its acceleration effects compared to classical RL. Our research findings illuminate how the return distribution in distributional RL algorithms helps the optimization.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2022.

Builds on

25 of 34 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
  2. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,179
  4. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
  5. 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 659
  6. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 547
  7. 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 464
  8. 2018Implicit Quantile Networks for Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 362
  9. 2018How Does Batch Normalization Help Optimization?cited by 355
  10. 2020On the Global Convergence Rates of Softmax Policy Gradient Methodscited by 258
  11. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learningcited by 212
  12. 2019On the Theory of Policy Gradient Methods: Optimality, Approximation, and Distribution Shiftcited by 174
13 more
  1. 2018Understanding the impact of entropy on policy optimizationcited by 171
  2. 2017The Cramer Distance as a Solution to Biased Wasserstein Gradientscited by 116
  3. 2019Fully Parameterized Quantile Function for Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 87
  4. 2020Revisiting Rainbow: Promoting more Insightful and Inclusive Deep Reinforcement Learning Researchcited by 78
  5. 2021Conservative Offline Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 78
  6. 2018Improving Regression Performance with Distributional Lossescited by 66
  7. 2021Spectral Normalisation for Deep Reinforcement Learning: an Optimisation Perspectivecited by 64
  8. 2019Distributional Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Explorationcited by 59
  9. 2019A Comparative Analysis of Expected and Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 47
  10. 2021Towards Deeper Deep Reinforcement Learning with Spectral Normalizationcited by 19
  11. 2020Towards Understanding Label Smoothingcited by 17
  12. 2021Functional Regularization for Reinforcement Learning via Learned Fourier Featurescited by 17
  13. 2020Distributional Reinforcement Learning via Moment Matchingcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.