mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Machine Learning for Optical Motion Capture-driven Musculoskeletal Modelling from Inertial Motion Capture Data

arXiv 2209.14456 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2022cs.LG cs.CV eess.IVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Marker-based Optical Motion Capture (OMC) systems and associated musculoskeletal (MSK) modelling predictions offer non-invasively obtainable insights into in vivo joint and muscle loading, aiding clinical decision-making. However, an OMC system is lab-based, expensive, and requires a line of sight. Inertial Motion Capture (IMC) systems are widely-used alternatives, which are portable, user-friendly, and relatively low-cost, although with lesser accuracy. Irrespective of the choice of motion capture technique, one needs to use an MSK model to obtain the kinematic and kinetic outputs, which is a computationally expensive tool increasingly well approximated by machine learning (ML) methods. Here, we present an ML approach to map experimentally recorded IMC data to the human upper-extremity MSK model outputs computed from ('gold standard') OMC input data. Essentially, we aim to predict higher-quality MSK outputs from the much easier-to-obtain IMC data. We use OMC and IMC data simultaneously collected for the same subjects to train different ML architectures that predict OMC-driven MSK outputs from IMC measurements. In particular, we employed various neural network (NN) architectures, such as Feed-Forward Neural Networks (FFNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) (vanilla, Long Short-Term Memory, and Gated Recurrent Unit) and searched for the best-fit model through an exhaustive search in the hyperparameters space in both subject-exposed (SE) & subject-naive (SN) settings. We observed a comparable performance for both FFNN & RNN models, which have a high degree of agreement (ravg, SE, FFNN = 0.90+/-0.19, ravg, SE, RNN = 0.89+/-0.17, ravg, SN, FFNN = 0.84+/-0.23, & ravg, SN, RNN = 0.78+/-0.23) with the desired OMC-driven MSK estimates for held-out test data. Mapping IMC inputs to OMC-driven MSK outputs using ML models could be instrumental in transitioning MSK modelling from 'lab to field'.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 92 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2022.

Builds on

3 of 92 references.

References · 3

  1. 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,304
  2. 2018Markerless tracking of user-defined features with deep learningcited by 206
  3. 2020A Primer on Motion Capture with Deep Learning: Principles, Pitfalls and Perspectivescited by 18

Built on by

Not cited yet.