Habitat classification from satellite observations with sparse annotations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Remote sensing benefits habitat conservation by making monitoring of large areas easier compared to field surveying especially if the remote sensed data can be automatically analyzed. An important aspect of monitoring is classifying and mapping habitat types present in the monitored area. Automatic classification is a difficult task, as classes have fine-grained differences and their distributions are long-tailed and unbalanced. Usually training data used for automatic land cover classification relies on fully annotated segmentation maps, annotated from remote sensed imagery to a fairly high-level taxonomy, i.e., classes such as forest, farmland, or urban area. A challenge with automatic habitat classification is that reliable data annotation requires field-surveys. Therefore, full segmentation maps are expensive to produce, and training data is often sparse, point-like, and limited to areas accessible by foot. Methods for utilizing these limited data more efficiently are needed. We address these problems by proposing a method for habitat classification and mapping, and apply this method to classify the entire northern Finnish Lapland area into Natura2000 classes. The method is characterized by using finely-grained, sparse, single-pixel annotations collected from the field, combined with large amounts of unannotated data to produce segmentation maps. Supervised, unsupervised and semi-supervised methods are compared, and the benefits of transfer learning from a larger out-of-domain dataset are demonstrated. We propose a acCNN biased towards center pixel classification ensembled with a random forest classifier, that produces higher quality classifications than the models themselves alone. We show that cropping augmentations, test-time augmentation and semi-supervised learning can help classification even further.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2022.
Builds on
14 of 64 references.
References · 14
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
- 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
- 2018Invariant Information Clustering for Unsupervised Image Classification and Segmentationcited by 454
- 2021Seasonal Contrast: Unsupervised Pre-Training from Uncurated Remote Sensing Datacited by 214
- 2021Crop mapping from image time series: deep learning with multi-scale label hierarchiescited by 42
- 2016Fully Convolutional Networks for Dense Semantic Labelling of High-Resolution Aerial Imagerycited by 36
- 2021Semantic Segmentation of Remote Sensing Images with Sparse Annotationscited by 30
Built on by
Not cited yet.