On the Complexity of Deterministic Nonsmooth and Nonconvex Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we present several new results on minimizing a nonsmooth and nonconvex function under a Lipschitz condition. Recent work shows that while the classical notion of Clarke stationarity is computationally intractable up to some sufficiently small constant tolerance, the randomized first-order algorithms find a (δ, ε)-Goldstein stationary point with the complexity bound of tildeO(δ-1ε-3), which is independent of dimension d ≥ 1~citepZhang-2020-Complexity, Davis-2022-Gradient, Tian-2022-Finite. However, the deterministic algorithms have not been fully explored, leaving open several problems in nonsmooth nonconvex optimization. Our first contribution is to demonstrate that the randomization is textitnecessary to obtain a dimension-independent guarantee, by proving a lower bound of Omega(d) for any deterministic algorithm that has access to both 1st and 0th oracles. Furthermore, we show that the 0th oracle is textitessential to obtain a finite-time convergence guarantee, by showing that any deterministic algorithm with only the 1st oracle is not able to find an approximate Goldstein stationary point within a finite number of iterations up to sufficiently small constant parameter and tolerance. Finally, we propose a deterministic smoothing approach under the textitarithmetic circuit model where the resulting smoothness parameter is exponential in a certain parameter M > 0 (e.g., the number of nodes in the representation of the function), and design a new deterministic first-order algorithm that achieves a dimension-independent complexity bound of tildeO(Mδ-1ε-3).
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023Optimal Stochastic Non-smooth Non-convex Optimization through Online-to-Non-convex Conversioncited by 42
- 2023Faster Gradient-Free Algorithms for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimizationcited by 16
- 2023A Block-Coordinate Approach of Multi-level Optimization with an Application to Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 7
- 2024Online Optimization Perspective on First-Order and Zero-Order Decentralized Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimizationcited by 3
- 2023Testing Stationarity Concepts for ReLU Networks: Hardness, Regularity, and Robust Algorithmscited by 2
- 2026Dynamic Regret via Discounted-to-Dynamic Reduction with Applications to Curved Losses and Adam Optimizercited by 2
- 2026Dynamic Regret via Discounted-to-Dynamic Reduction with Applications to Curved Losses and Adam Optimizer9 Feb 2026
- 2024Online Optimization Perspective on First-Order and Zero-Order Decentralized Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization3 Jun 2024
- 2023A Block-Coordinate Approach of Multi-level Optimization with an Application to Physics-Informed Neural Networks23 May 2023
- 2023Testing Stationarity Concepts for ReLU Networks: Hardness, Regularity, and Robust Algorithms23 Feb 2023
- 2023Optimal Stochastic Non-smooth Non-convex Optimization through Online-to-Non-convex Conversion7 Feb 2023
- 2023Faster Gradient-Free Algorithms for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization16 Jan 2023