mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Visual representations in the human brain are aligned with large language models

arXiv 2209.11737 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2022cs.CV cs.LG q-bio.NCcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The human brain extracts complex information from visual inputs, including objects, their spatial and semantic interrelations, and their interactions with the environment. However, a quantitative approach for studying this information remains elusive. Here, we test whether the contextual information encoded in large language models (LLMs) is beneficial for modelling the complex visual information extracted by the brain from natural scenes. We show that LLM embeddings of scene captions successfully characterise brain activity evoked by viewing the natural scenes. This mapping captures selectivities of different brain areas, and is sufficiently robust that accurate scene captions can be reconstructed from brain activity. Using carefully controlled model comparisons, we then proceed to show that the accuracy with which LLM representations match brain representations derives from the ability of LLMs to integrate complex information contained in scene captions beyond that conveyed by individual words. Finally, we train deep neural network models to transform image inputs into LLM representations. Remarkably, these networks learn representations that are better aligned with brain representations than a large number of state-of-the-art alternative models, despite being trained on orders-of-magnitude less data. Overall, our results suggest that LLM embeddings of scene captions provide a representational format that accounts for complex information extracted by the brain from visual inputs.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 113 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2022.

Builds on

29 of 113 references.

References · 29

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  4. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  5. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  6. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  7. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  8. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  9. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  10. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
  11. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
  12. 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,548
17 more
  1. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,447
  2. 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 998
  3. 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 973
  4. 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 869
  5. 2018Taskonomy: Disentangling Task Transfer Learningcited by 631
  6. 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 604
  7. 2021Scaling Laws for Transfercited by 265
  8. 2021Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine visioncited by 185
  9. 2022A Survey of Vision-Language Pre-Trained Modelscited by 177
  10. 2022VLP: A Survey on Vision-Language Pre-trainingcited by 159
  11. 2014Deep Neural Networks Reveal a Gradient in the Complexity of Neural Representations across the Brain's Ventral Visual Pathwaycited by 93
  12. 2016Towards an integration of deep learning and neurosciencecited by 77
  13. 2019Recurrence is required to capture the representational dynamics of the human visual systemcited by 58
  14. 2022The neuroconnectionist research programmecited by 47
  15. 2018Cognitive computational neurosciencecited by 43
  16. 2020Fractional ridge regression: a fast, interpretable reparameterization of ridge regressioncited by 4
  17. 2015Semantic vector space models predict neural responses to complex visual stimulicited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Talking to the brain: Using Large Language Models as Proxies to Model Brain Semantic Representation
  2. 2024MindSemantix: Deciphering Brain Visual Experiences with a Brain-Language Model
  3. 2024Human-like object concept representations emerge naturally in multimodal large language models
  4. 2024Aligned with LLM: a new multi-modal training paradigm for encoding fMRI activity in visual cortex
  5. 2024Vision-Language Models Align with Human Neural Representations in Concept Processing
  6. 2025Do Large Language Models Think Like the Brain? Sentence-Level Evidences from Layer-Wise Embeddings and fMRI
  7. 2023Brain Captioning: Decoding human brain activity into images and text
  8. 2022Semantic Brain Decoding: from fMRI to conceptually similar image reconstruction of visual stimuli