MLGWSC-1: The first Machine Learning Gravitational-Wave Search Mock Data Challenge
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present the results of the first Machine Learning Gravitational-Wave Search Mock Data Challenge (MLGWSC-1). For this challenge, participating groups had to identify gravitational-wave signals from binary black hole mergers of increasing complexity and duration embedded in progressively more realistic noise. The final of the 4 provided datasets contained real noise from the O3a observing run and signals up to a duration of 20 seconds with the inclusion of precession effects and higher order modes. We present the average sensitivity distance and runtime for the 6 entered algorithms derived from 1 month of test data unknown to the participants prior to submission. Of these, 4 are machine learning algorithms. We find that the best machine learning based algorithms are able to achieve up to 95% of the sensitive distance of matched-filtering based production analyses for simulated Gaussian noise at a false-alarm rate (FAR) of one per month. In contrast, for real noise, the leading machine learning search achieved 70%. For higher FARs the differences in sensitive distance shrink to the point where select machine learning submissions outperform traditional search algorithms at FARs ≥ 200 per month on some datasets. Our results show that current machine learning search algorithms may already be sensitive enough in limited parameter regions to be useful for some production settings. To improve the state-of-the-art, machine learning algorithms need to reduce the false-alarm rates at which they are capable of detecting signals and extend their validity to regions of parameter space where modeled searches are computationally expensive to run. Based on our findings we compile a list of research areas that we believe are the most important to elevate machine learning searches to an invaluable tool in gravitational-wave signal detection.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2022.
Builds on
10 of 87 references.
References · 10
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
- 2015MXNet: A Flexible and Efficient Machine Learning Library for Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 195
- 2019Bayesian parameter estimation using conditional variational autoencoders for gravitational-wave astronomycited by 36
- 2017Deep Learning for Real-time Gravitational Wave Detection and Parameter Estimation: Results with Advanced LIGO Datacited by 33
- 2021Applications and Techniques for Fast Machine Learning in Sciencecited by 32
- 2020Accelerated, Scalable and Reproducible AI-driven Gravitational Wave Detectioncited by 20
- 2021Source-Agnostic Gravitational-Wave Detection with Recurrent Autoencoderscited by 7
- 2022Inference-optimized AI and high performance computing for gravitational wave detection at scalecited by 5
- 2021AI and extreme scale computing to learn and infer the physics of higher order gravitational wave modes of quasi-circular, spinning, non-precessing binary black hole mergerscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2023Towards a robust and reliable deep learning approach for detection of compact binary mergers in gravitational wave datacited by 0
- 2025Learning and Interpreting Gravitational-Wave Features from CNNs with a Random Forest Approachcited by 0
- 2026Agentic AI for Gravitational Wave Data Analysis: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Coding Agents Executing a Matched Filter Pipeline on Einstein Telescope Simulated Datacited by 0
- 2026AI-enabled gravitational-waves searches for binary neutron stars at optimal sensitivitycited by 0
- 2026AI-enabled gravitational-waves searches for binary neutron stars at optimal sensitivity1 Jul 2026
- 2026Agentic AI for Gravitational Wave Data Analysis: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Coding Agents Executing a Matched Filter Pipeline on Einstein Telescope Simulated Data27 May 2026
- 2025Learning and Interpreting Gravitational-Wave Features from CNNs with a Random Forest Approach26 May 2025
- 2023Towards a robust and reliable deep learning approach for detection of compact binary mergers in gravitational wave data20 Jun 2023