Inference-optimized AI and high performance computing for gravitational wave detection at scale
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce an ensemble of artificial intelligence models for gravitational wave detection that we trained in the Summit supercomputer using 32 nodes, equivalent to 192 NVIDIA V100 GPUs, within 2 hours. Once fully trained, we optimized these models for accelerated inference using NVIDIA TensorRT. We deployed our inference-optimized AI ensemble in the ThetaGPU supercomputer at Argonne Leadership Computer Facility to conduct distributed inference. Using the entire ThetaGPU supercomputer, consisting of 20 nodes each of which has 8 NVIDIA A100 Tensor Core GPUs and 2 AMD Rome CPUs, our NVIDIA TensorRT-optimized AI ensemble processed an entire month of advanced LIGO data (including Hanford and Livingston data streams) within 50 seconds. Our inference-optimized AI ensemble retains the same sensitivity of traditional AI models, namely, it identifies all known binary black hole mergers previously identified in this advanced LIGO dataset and reports no misclassifications, while also providing a 3X inference speedup compared to traditional artificial intelligence models. We used time slides to quantify the performance of our AI ensemble to process up to 5 years worth of advanced LIGO data. In this synthetically enhanced dataset, our AI ensemble reports an average of one misclassification for every month of searched advanced LIGO data. We also present the receiver operating characteristic curve of our AI ensemble using this 5 year long advanced LIGO dataset. This approach provides the required tools to conduct accelerated, AI-driven gravitational wave detection at scale.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2022.
Builds on
23 of 76 references.
References · 23
- 2016WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audiocited by 1,710
- 2021Real-time gravitational-wave science with neural posterior estimationcited by 76
- 2019Bayesian parameter estimation using conditional variational autoencoders for gravitational-wave astronomycited by 36
- 2017Deep Learning for Real-time Gravitational Wave Detection and Parameter Estimation: Results with Advanced LIGO Datacited by 33
- 2020Complete parameter inference for GW150914 using deep learningcited by 25
- 2016Deep Neural Networks to Enable Real-time Multimessenger Astrophysicscited by 24
- 2020Accelerated, Scalable and Reproducible AI-driven Gravitational Wave Detectioncited by 20
- 2020Gravitational-wave parameter estimation with autoregressive neural network flowscited by 19
- 2019Learning Bayesian posteriors with neural networks for gravitational-wave inferencecited by 18
- 2019Enabling real-time multi-messenger astrophysics discoveries with deep learningcited by 18
- 2018DLHub: Model and Data Serving for Sciencecited by 17
- 2021Group equivariant neural posterior estimationcited by 16
11 more
- 2019Statistically-informed deep learning for gravitational wave parameter estimationcited by 14
- 2019Denoising Gravitational Waves with Enhanced Deep Recurrent Denoising Auto-Encoderscited by 10
- 2021Advances in Machine and Deep Learning for Modeling and Real-time Detection of Multi-Messenger Sourcescited by 10
- 2018Reduced-order modeling with artificial neurons for gravitational-wave inferencecited by 9
- 2020Detection of gravitational-wave signals from binary neutron star mergers using machine learningcited by 9
- 2020Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and High Performance Computing on NSF-supported Cyberinfrastructurecited by 7
- 2020Detection of Gravitational Waves Using Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 7
- 2020Genetic-algorithm-optimized neural networks for gravitational wave classificationcited by 6
- 2021Training Strategies for Deep Learning Gravitational-Wave Searchescited by 5
- 2021From One to Many: A Deep Learning Coincident Gravitational-Wave Searchcited by 5
- 2021Interpretable AI forecasting for numerical relativity waveforms of quasi-circular, spinning, non-precessing binary black hole mergerscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 5.
5 papers.
- 2022Applications of physics informed neural operatorscited by 33
- 2022FAIR for AI: An interdisciplinary and international community building perspectivecited by 13
- 2022MLGWSC-1: The first Machine Learning Gravitational-Wave Search Mock Data Challengecited by 4
- 2022Interpreting a Machine Learning Model for Detecting Gravitational Wavescited by 2
- 2022DeepSNR: A deep learning foundation for offline gravitational wave detectioncited by 0
- 2022FAIR for AI: An interdisciplinary and international community building perspective30 Sep 2022
- 2022MLGWSC-1: The first Machine Learning Gravitational-Wave Search Mock Data Challenge22 Sep 2022
- 2022DeepSNR: A deep learning foundation for offline gravitational wave detection11 Jul 2022
- 2022Applications of physics informed neural operators23 Mar 2022
- 2022Interpreting a Machine Learning Model for Detecting Gravitational Waves15 Feb 2022
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Recent Advances in Simulation-based Inference for Gravitational Wave Data Analysis
- 2026Agentic AI for Gravitational Wave Data Analysis: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Coding Agents Executing a Matched Filter Pipeline on Einstein Telescope Simulated Data
- 2026Discovery of Interpretable Surrogates via Agentic AI: Application to Gravitational Waves
- 2022S4: a High-sparsity, High-performance AI Accelerator
- 2026Scaling LLM Inference Beyond Amdahl`s Limits via Eliminating Non-Scalable Overheads ↗
- 2026BaseRT: Advancing Best-in-Class LLM Inference with Apple M5 Neural Accelerators
- 2026Efficient Mixture-of-Experts LLM Inference with Apple Silicon NPUs
- 2026Characterizing Parallelism Strategies in LLM Inference: Fundamental Compute-Communication Trade-offs