mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

In Differential Privacy, There is Truth: On Vote Leakage in Ensemble Private Learning

arXiv 2209.10732 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2022cs.LG cs.CRcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When learning from sensitive data, care must be taken to ensure that training algorithms address privacy concerns. The canonical Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles, or PATE, computes output labels by aggregating the predictions of a (possibly distributed) collection of teacher models via a voting mechanism. The mechanism adds noise to attain a differential privacy guarantee with respect to the teachers' training data. In this work, we observe that this use of noise, which makes PATE predictions stochastic, enables new forms of leakage of sensitive information. For a given input, our adversary exploits this stochasticity to extract high-fidelity histograms of the votes submitted by the underlying teachers. From these histograms, the adversary can learn sensitive attributes of the input such as race, gender, or age. Although this attack does not directly violate the differential privacy guarantee, it clearly violates privacy norms and expectations, and would not be possible at all without the noise inserted to obtain differential privacy. In fact, counter-intuitively, the attack becomes easier as we add more noise to provide stronger differential privacy. We hope this encourages future work to consider privacy holistically rather than treat differential privacy as a panacea.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2022.

Builds on

15 of 35 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,718
  2. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,470
  3. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,243
  4. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 711
  5. 2019Agnostic Federated Learningcited by 453
  6. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 382
  7. 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 347
  8. 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 334
  9. 2018Scalable Private Learning with PATEcited by 268
  10. 2018Beyond Inferring Class Representatives: User-Level Privacy Leakage From Federated Learningcited by 246
  11. 2019G-PATE: Scalable Differentially Private Data Generator via Private Aggregation of Teacher Discriminatorscited by 53
  12. 2021Antipodes of Label Differential Privacy: PATE and ALIBIcited by 52
3 more
  1. 2021CaPC Learning: Confidential and Private Collaborative Learningcited by 33
  2. 2021DataLens: Scalable Privacy Preserving Training via Gradient Compression and Aggregationcited by 31
  3. 2021PATE-AAE: Incorporating Adversarial Autoencoder into Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles for Spoken Command Classificationcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

2 papers.