A Joint Imitation-Reinforcement Learning Framework for Reduced Baseline Regret
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In various control task domains, existing controllers provide a baseline level of performance that -- though possibly suboptimal -- should be maintained. Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms that rely on extensive exploration of the state and action space can be used to optimize a control policy. However, fully exploratory RL algorithms may decrease performance below a baseline level during training. In this paper, we address the issue of online optimization of a control policy while minimizing regret w.r.t a baseline policy performance. We present a joint imitation-reinforcement learning framework, denoted JIRL. The learning process in JIRL assumes the availability of a baseline policy and is designed with two objectives in mind (a) leveraging the baseline's online demonstrations to minimize the regret w.r.t the baseline policy during training, and (b) eventually surpassing the baseline performance. JIRL addresses these objectives by initially learning to imitate the baseline policy and gradually shifting control from the baseline to an RL agent. Experimental results show that JIRL effectively accomplishes the aforementioned objectives in several, continuous action-space domains. The results demonstrate that JIRL is comparable to a state-of-the-art algorithm in its final performance while incurring significantly lower baseline regret during training in all of the presented domains. Moreover, the results show a reduction factor of up to 21 in baseline regret over a state-of-the-art baseline regret minimization approach.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2022.
Builds on
20 of 35 references.
References · 20
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
- 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
- 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 427
- 2017Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guaranteescited by 347
- 2018Learning to Drive in a Daycited by 266
- 2019End-to-End Safe Reinforcement Learning through Barrier Functions for Safety-Critical Continuous Control Taskscited by 256
- 2018Safe Exploration in Continuous Action Spacescited by 237
- 2017Safe Policy Improvement with Baseline Bootstrappingcited by 141
8 more
- 2017Trial without Error: Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning via Human Interventioncited by 102
- 2018EnsembleDAgger: A Bayesian Approach to Safe Imitation Learningcited by 96
- 2016Query-Efficient Imitation Learning for End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 83
- 2018Reinforcement Learning from Imperfect Demonstrationscited by 74
- 2016Safe Exploration in Finite Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian Processescited by 72
- 2016Safe Policy Improvement by Minimizing Robust Baseline Regretcited by 51
- 2017Safe Learning of Quadrotor Dynamics Using Barrier Certificatescited by 32
- 2013Bounded regret in stochastic multi-armed banditscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.