mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-armed Bandit Learning on a Graph

arXiv 2209.09419 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2022cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The multi-armed bandit(MAB) problem is a simple yet powerful framework that has been extensively studied in the context of decision-making under uncertainty. In many real-world applications, such as robotic applications, selecting an arm corresponds to a physical action that constrains the choices of the next available arms (actions). Motivated by this, we study an extension of MAB called the graph bandit, where an agent travels over a graph to maximize the reward collected from different nodes. The graph defines the agent's freedom in selecting the next available nodes at each step. We assume the graph structure is fully available, but the reward distributions are unknown. Built upon an offline graph-based planning algorithm and the principle of optimism, we design a learning algorithm, G-UCB, that balances long-term exploration-exploitation using the principle of optimism. We show that our proposed algorithm achieves O(√|S|Tlog(T)+D|S|log T) learning regret, where |S| is the number of nodes and D is the diameter of the graph, which matches the theoretical lower bound Omega(√|S|T) up to logarithmic factors. To our knowledge, this result is among the first tight regret bounds in non-episodic, un-discounted learning problems with known deterministic transitions. Numerical experiments confirm that our algorithm outperforms several benchmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2022.

Builds on

19 of 49 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 500
  2. 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 485
  3. 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
  4. 2019Provably Efficient Exploration in Policy Optimizationcited by 203
  5. 2019Tighter Problem-Dependent Regret Bounds in Reinforcement Learning without Domain Knowledge using Value Function Boundscited by 194
  6. 2020Reward-Free Exploration for Reinforcement Learningcited by 177
  7. 2020Almost Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learning via Reference-Advantage Decompositioncited by 127
  8. 2015Multi-armed Bandit Models for the Optimal Design of Clinical Trials: Benefits and Challengescited by 113
  9. 2021Breaking the Sample Complexity Barrier to Regret-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 51
  10. 2020Near-optimal Regret Bounds for Stochastic Shortest Pathcited by 50
  11. 2020Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Discounted MDPscited by 42
  12. 2016Wireless Communications with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Opportunities and Challengescited by 40
7 more
  1. 2016On Lower Bounds for Regret in Reinforcement Learningcited by 39
  2. 2013Bandits with Switching Costs: T^{2/3} Regretcited by 38
  3. 2021Stochastic Shortest Path: Minimax, Parameter-Free and Towards Horizon-Free Regretcited by 34
  4. 2020Model-Free Reinforcement Learning: from Clipped Pseudo-Regret to Sample Complexitycited by 28
  5. 2018Online learning over a finite action set with limited switchingcited by 21
  6. 2019Minimax Regret of Switching-Constrained Online Convex Optimization: No Phase Transitioncited by 17
  7. 2016A Non-stochastic Learning Approach to Energy Efficient Mobility Managementcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.