Analyzing Machine Learning Models for Credit Scoring with Explainable AI and Optimizing Investment Decisions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper examines two different yet related questions related to explainable AI (XAI) practices. Machine learning (ML) is increasingly important in financial services, such as pre-approval, credit underwriting, investments, and various front-end and back-end activities. Machine Learning can automatically detect non-linearities and interactions in training data, facilitating faster and more accurate credit decisions. However, machine learning models are opaque and hard to explain, which are critical elements needed for establishing a reliable technology. The study compares various machine learning models, including single classifiers (logistic regression, decision trees, LDA, QDA), heterogeneous ensembles (AdaBoost, Random Forest), and sequential neural networks. The results indicate that ensemble classifiers and neural networks outperform. In addition, two advanced post-hoc model agnostic explainability techniques - LIME and SHAP are utilized to assess ML-based credit scoring models using the open-access datasets offered by US-based P2P Lending Platform, Lending Club. For this study, we are also using machine learning algorithms to develop new investment models and explore portfolio strategies that can maximize profitability while minimizing risk.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2022.
Builds on
5 of 21 references.
References · 5
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2017Interpreting Blackbox Models via Model Extractioncited by 43
- 2019E.T.-RNN: Applying Deep Learning to Credit Loan Applicationscited by 26
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.