How to Adapt Pre-trained Vision-and-Language Models to a Text-only Input?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Current language models have been criticised for learning language from text alone without connection between words and their meaning. Consequently, multimodal training has been proposed as a way for creating models with better language understanding by providing the lacking connection. We focus on pre-trained multimodal vision-and-language (VL) models for which there already are some results on their language understanding capabilities. An unresolved issue with evaluating the linguistic skills of these models, however, is that there is no established method for adapting them to text-only input without out-of-distribution uncertainty. To find the best approach, we investigate and compare seven possible methods for adapting three different pre-trained VL models to text-only input. Our evaluations on both GLUE and Visual Property Norms (VPN) show that care should be put into adapting VL models to zero-shot text-only tasks, while the models are less sensitive to how we adapt them to non-zero-shot tasks. We also find that the adaptation methods perform differently for different models and that unimodal model counterparts perform on par with the VL models regardless of adaptation, indicating that current VL models do not necessarily gain better language understanding from their multimodal training.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2022.
Builds on
30 of 37 references.
References · 30
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
- 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
- 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,548
- 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
- 2019VisualBERT: A Simple and Performant Baseline for Vision and Languagecited by 1,291
- 2019VL-BERT: Pre-training of Generic Visual-Linguistic Representationscited by 954
- 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
18 more
- 2021Multimodal Few-Shot Learning with Frozen Language Modelscited by 657
- 2021FLAVA: A Foundational Language And Vision Alignment Modelcited by 646
- 2021Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processingcited by 526
- 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 523
- 2021Learning How to Ask: Querying LMs with Mixtures of Soft Promptscited by 376
- 2015Visual7W: Grounded Question Answering in Imagescited by 315
- 2020Experience Grounds Languagecited by 241
- 2021Can Language Models Encode Perceptual Structure Without Grounding? A Case Study in Colorcited by 118
- 2021Knowledgeable or Educated Guess? Revisiting Language Models as Knowledge Basescited by 107
- 2020Vokenization: Improving Language Understanding with Contextualized, Visual-Grounded Supervisioncited by 93
- 2020Multimodal Pretraining Unmasked: A Meta-Analysis and a Unified Framework of Vision-and-Language BERTscited by 71
- 2021Vision-and-Language or Vision-for-Language? On Cross-Modal Influence in Multimodal Transformerscited by 71
- 2020Does my multimodal model learn cross-modal interactions? It's harder to tell than you might think!cited by 61
- 2021The World of an Octopus: How Reporting Bias Influences a Language Model's Perception of Colorcited by 32
- 2021Does Vision-and-Language Pretraining Improve Lexical Grounding?cited by 25
- 2021Effect of Visual Extensions on Natural Language Understanding in Vision-and-Language Modelscited by 18
- 2021Transferring Knowledge from Vision to Language: How to Achieve it and how to Measure it?cited by 18
- 2022What do Models Learn From Training on More Than Text? Measuring Visual Commonsense Knowledgecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023PVP: Pre-trained Visual Parameter-Efficient Tuningcited by 1
- 2023Table and Image Generation for Investigating Knowledge of Entities in Pre-trained Vision and Language Modelscited by 1
- 2023Controlling for Stereotypes in Multimodal Language Model Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Multimodal Diffusion to Mutually Enhance Polarized Light and Low Resolution EBSD Datacited by 0
- 2026Multimodal Diffusion to Mutually Enhance Polarized Light and Low Resolution EBSD Data24 Apr 2026
- 2023Table and Image Generation for Investigating Knowledge of Entities in Pre-trained Vision and Language Models3 Jun 2023
- 2023PVP: Pre-trained Visual Parameter-Efficient Tuning26 Apr 2023
- 2023Controlling for Stereotypes in Multimodal Language Model Evaluation3 Feb 2023