Adversarial Coreset Selection for Efficient Robust Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks: adding well-crafted, imperceptible perturbations to their input can modify their output. Adversarial training is one of the most effective approaches to training robust models against such attacks. Unfortunately, this method is much slower than vanilla training of neural networks since it needs to construct adversarial examples for the entire training data at every iteration. By leveraging the theory of coreset selection, we show how selecting a small subset of training data provides a principled approach to reducing the time complexity of robust training. To this end, we first provide convergence guarantees for adversarial coreset selection. In particular, we show that the convergence bound is directly related to how well our coresets can approximate the gradient computed over the entire training data. Motivated by our theoretical analysis, we propose using this gradient approximation error as our adversarial coreset selection objective to reduce the training set size effectively. Once built, we run adversarial training over this subset of the training data. Unlike existing methods, our approach can be adapted to a wide variety of training objectives, including TRADES, ℓp-PGD, and Perceptual Adversarial Training. We conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate that our approach speeds up adversarial training by 2-3 times while experiencing a slight degradation in the clean and robust accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2022.
Builds on
33 of 53 references.
References · 33
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
- 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,254
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
21 more
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 689
- 2020NVAE: A Deep Hierarchical Variational Autoencodercited by 637
- 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 629
- 2019Green AIcited by 627
- 2020Reflection Backdoor: A Natural Backdoor Attack on Deep Neural Networkscited by 349
- 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 328
- 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 274
- 2020GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learningcited by 226
- 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 214
- 2018Spatially Transformed Adversarial Examplescited by 195
- 2019Understanding Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning Based Medical Image Analysis Systemscited by 153
- 2019Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearizationcited by 146
- 2020Perceptual Adversarial Robustness: Defense Against Unseen Threat Modelscited by 137
- 2019Functional Adversarial Attackscited by 82
- 2021RETRIEVE: Coreset Selection for Efficient and Robust Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 74
- 2018Bayesian Coreset Construction via Greedy Iterative Geodesic Ascentcited by 68
- 2016Restricted Strong Convexity Implies Weak Submodularitycited by 52
- 2020Introduction to Core-sets: an Updated Surveycited by 45
- 2022Make Some Noise: Reliable and Efficient Single-Step Adversarial Trainingcited by 43
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2023Efficient Adversarial Contrastive Learning via Robustness-Aware Coreset Selectioncited by 14
- 2023Focus on Hiders: Exploring Hidden Threats for Enhancing Adversarial Trainingcited by 9
- 2023Data-Efficient Training of CNNs and Transformers with Coresets: A Stability Perspectivecited by 6
- 2024Large-Scale Dataset Pruning in Adversarial Training through Data Importance Extrapolationcited by 2
- 2024Artificial Immune System of Secure Face Recognition Against Adversarial Attackscited by 2
- 2025Effective Data Pruning through Score Extrapolationcited by 2
- 2023Score-Based Methods for Discrete Optimization in Deep Learningcited by 0
- 2025Efficient Semi-Supervised Adversarial Training via Latent Clustering-Based Data Reductioncited by 0
- 2026First-order Constrained Trilevel Optimization Over Distributed Networks for Robust Coreset Selectioncited by 0
- 2026First-order Constrained Trilevel Optimization Over Distributed Networks for Robust Coreset Selection30 Jul 2026
- 2025Effective Data Pruning through Score Extrapolation10 Jun 2025
- 2025Efficient Semi-Supervised Adversarial Training via Latent Clustering-Based Data Reduction15 Jan 2025
- 2024Artificial Immune System of Secure Face Recognition Against Adversarial Attacks26 Jun 2024
- 2024Large-Scale Dataset Pruning in Adversarial Training through Data Importance Extrapolation19 Jun 2024
- 2023Focus on Hiders: Exploring Hidden Threats for Enhancing Adversarial Training12 Dec 2023
- 2023Score-Based Methods for Discrete Optimization in Deep Learning15 Oct 2023
- 2023Data-Efficient Training of CNNs and Transformers with Coresets: A Stability Perspective3 Mar 2023
- 2023Efficient Adversarial Contrastive Learning via Robustness-Aware Coreset Selection8 Feb 2023