mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DECK: Behavioral Tests to Improve Interpretability and Generalizability of BERT Models Detecting Depression from Text

arXiv 2209.05286 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2022cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Models that accurately detect depression from text are important tools for addressing the post-pandemic mental health crisis. BERT-based classifiers' promising performance and the off-the-shelf availability make them great candidates for this task. However, these models are known to suffer from performance inconsistencies and poor generalization. In this paper, we introduce the DECK (DEpression ChecKlist), depression-specific model behavioural tests that allow better interpretability and improve generalizability of BERT classifiers in depression domain. We create 23 tests to evaluate BERT, RoBERTa and ALBERT depression classifiers on three datasets, two Twitter-based and one clinical interview-based. Our evaluation shows that these models: 1) are robust to certain gender-sensitive variations in text; 2) rely on the important depressive language marker of the increased use of first person pronouns; 3) fail to detect some other depression symptoms like suicidal ideation. We also demonstrate that DECK tests can be used to incorporate symptom-specific information in the training data and consistently improve generalizability of all three BERT models, with an out-of-distribution F1-score increase of up to 53.93%.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2022.

Builds on

22 of 62 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
  4. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  5. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  6. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
  7. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
  8. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
  9. 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 807
  10. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
  11. 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 436
  12. 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 317
10 more
  1. 2019Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasetscited by 173
  2. 2018Breaking NLI Systems with Sentences that Require Simple Lexical Inferencescited by 134
  3. 2019Do Neural Language Representations Learn Physical Commonsense?cited by 62
  4. 2018Performance Impact Caused by Hidden Bias of Training Data for Recognizing Textual Entailmentcited by 58
  5. 2019Investigating BERT's Knowledge of Language: Five Analysis Methods with NPIscited by 58
  6. 2018Did You Really Just Have a Heart Attack? Towards Robust Detection of Personal Health Mentions in Social Mediacited by 22
  7. 2019What Twitter Profile and Posted Images Reveal About Depression and Anxietycited by 17
  8. 2021Micromodels for Efficient, Explainable, and Reusable Systems: A Case Study on Mental Healthcited by 13
  9. 2018Detecting cognitive impairments by agreeing on interpretations of linguistic featurescited by 6
  10. 2021Robustness and Sensitivity of BERT Models Predicting Alzheimer's Disease from Textcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

2 papers.