mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Harnessing Abstractive Summarization for Fact-Checked Claim Detection

arXiv 2209.04612 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2022cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Social media platforms have become new battlegrounds for anti-social elements, with misinformation being the weapon of choice. Fact-checking organizations try to debunk as many claims as possible while staying true to their journalistic processes but cannot cope with its rapid dissemination. We believe that the solution lies in partial automation of the fact-checking life cycle, saving human time for tasks which require high cognition. We propose a new workflow for efficiently detecting previously fact-checked claims that uses abstractive summarization to generate crisp queries. These queries can then be executed on a general-purpose retrieval system associated with a collection of previously fact-checked claims. We curate an abstractive text summarization dataset comprising noisy claims from Twitter and their gold summaries. It is shown that retrieval performance improves 2x by using popular out-of-the-box summarization models and 3x by fine-tuning them on the accompanying dataset compared to verbatim querying. Our approach achieves Recall@5 and MRR of 35% and 0.3, compared to baseline values of 10% and 0.1, respectively. Our dataset, code, and models are available publicly: https://github.com/varadhbhatnagar/FC-Claim-Det/

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2022.

Builds on

23 of 41 references.

References · 23

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  4. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  5. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
  6. 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,100
  7. 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
  8. 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 809
  9. 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 754
  10. 2021Get Your Vitamin C! Robust Fact Verification with Contrastive Evidencecited by 222
  11. 2021Automated Fact-Checking for Assisting Human Fact-Checkerscited by 144
  12. 2020That is a Known Lie: Detecting Previously Fact-Checked Claimscited by 82
11 more
  1. 2020Pre-trained Summarization Distillationcited by 70
  2. 2019NCLS: Neural Cross-Lingual Summarizationcited by 64
  3. 2020Generating Fact Checking Briefscited by 50
  4. 2020Where Are the Facts? Searching for Fact-checked Information to Alleviate the Spread of Fake Newscited by 48
  5. 2020CoCon: A Self-Supervised Approach for Controlled Text Generationcited by 47
  6. 2020ERNIE-GEN: An Enhanced Multi-Flow Pre-training and Fine-tuning Framework for Natural Language Generationcited by 39
  7. 2020An Exploratory Study of COVID-19 Misinformation on Twittercited by 33
  8. 2020CheckThat! at CLEF 2020: Enabling the Automatic Identification and Verification of Claims in Social Mediacited by 25
  9. 2021Assisting the Human Fact-Checkers: Detecting All Previously Fact-Checked Claims in a Documentcited by 19
  10. 2021The Role of Context in Detecting Previously Fact-Checked Claimscited by 17
  11. 2020Generating Fact Checking Summaries for Web Claimscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

5 papers.