Losing momentum in continuous-time stochastic optimisation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The training of modern machine learning models often consists in solving high-dimensional non-convex optimisation problems that are subject to large-scale data. In this context, momentum-based stochastic optimisation algorithms have become particularly widespread. The stochasticity arises from data subsampling which reduces computational cost. Both, momentum and stochasticity help the algorithm to converge globally. In this work, we propose and analyse a continuous-time model for stochastic gradient descent with momentum. This model is a piecewise-deterministic Markov process that represents the optimiser by an underdamped dynamical system and the data subsampling through a stochastic switching. We investigate longtime limits, the subsampling-to-no-subsampling limit, and the momentum-to-no-momentum limit. We are particularly interested in the case of reducing the momentum over time. Under convexity assumptions, we show convergence of our dynamical system to the global minimiser when reducing momentum over time and letting the subsampling rate go to infinity. We then propose a stable, symplectic discretisation scheme to construct an algorithm from our continuous-time dynamical system. In experiments, we study our scheme in convex and non-convex test problems. Additionally, we train a convolutional neural network in an image classification problem. Our algorithm {attains} competitive results compared to stochastic gradient descent with momentum.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2022.
Builds on
23 of 45 references.
References · 23
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
- 2014Deeply-Supervised Netscited by 364
- 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 339
- 2015A Differential Equation for Modeling Nesterov's Accelerated Gradient Method: Theory and Insightscited by 203
- 2020A Simple Convergence Proof of Adam and Adagradcited by 169
- 2020An Improved Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Descent with Momentumcited by 117
11 more
- 2017Gradient Descent Can Take Exponential Time to Escape Saddle Pointscited by 74
- 2018Understanding the Acceleration Phenomenon via High-Resolution Differential Equationscited by 68
- 2018Escaping Saddles with Stochastic Gradientscited by 66
- 2016Gradient Descent Only Converges to Minimizers: Non-Isolated Critical Points and Invariant Regionscited by 33
- 2021The Benefits of Implicit Regularization from SGD in Least Squares Problemscited by 32
- 2019Acceleration via Symplectic Discretization of High-Resolution Differential Equationscited by 27
- 2020Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Descent in Continuous Timecited by 24
- 2021SGD: The Role of Implicit Regularization, Batch-size and Multiple-epochscited by 22
- 2021A Continuous-time Stochastic Gradient Descent Method for Continuous Datacited by 7
- 2020A piecewise conservative method for unconstrained convex optimizationcited by 1
- 2022Gradient flows and randomised thresholding: sparse inversion and classificationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
2 papers.